These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22614266)

  • 21. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database for Open Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Guan J; Bisson EF; Dailey AT; Hood RS; Schmidt MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41(7):E416-21. PubMed ID: 26536435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases.
    Lee JC; Jang HD; Shin BJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Aug; 37(18):1548-57. PubMed ID: 22426447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study.
    Seng C; Siddiqui MA; Wong KP; Zhang K; Yeo W; Tan SB; Yue WM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2049-55. PubMed ID: 23963015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Park Y; Ha JW; Lee YT; Sung NY
    Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 21377602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effectiveness of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion assisted with microscope in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease].
    Zhang W; Duan L; Shang X; Xu X; Hu Y; He R
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 23672122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up.
    Zairi F; Arikat A; Allaoui M; Assaker R
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2013 May; 74(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 23307308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.
    Wu J; Zhang C; Lu K; Li C; Zhou Y
    Pain Physician; 2019 Nov; 22(6):E587-E599. PubMed ID: 31775412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
    Shunwu F; Xing Z; Fengdong Z; Xiangqian F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Aug; 35(17):1615-20. PubMed ID: 20479702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microendoscopy-Assisted Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: 5-Year Outcomes.
    Yang Y; Liu ZY; Zhang LM; Pang M; Chhantyal K; Wu WB; Chen ZH; Luo CX; Rong LM; Liu B
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e602-e610. PubMed ID: 29778600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?
    Cheng JS; Park P; Le H; Reisner L; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E6. PubMed ID: 23905957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Comparison of Minimally Invasive and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: An Analysis of the Prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Foley KT; Glassman SD; Shaffrey CI; Wang MY; Park P; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurgery; 2020 Sep; 87(3):555-562. PubMed ID: 32409828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparison of short-term effectiveness between minimally invasive surgery- and open-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level lumbar degenerative disease].
    Yang J; Kong Q; Song Y; Liu H; Zeng J
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 23672121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study.
    Wu MH; Dubey NK; Li YY; Lee CY; Cheng CC; Shi CS; Huang TJ
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1082-1090. PubMed ID: 28412560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Versus Traditional Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Spondylolisthesis Grades 1 and 2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Qin R; Liu B; Zhou P; Yao Y; Hao J; Yang K; Xu TL; Zhang F; Chen X
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():180-189. PubMed ID: 30414524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical outcomes of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis by minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bilateral tubular channels].
    Zeng ZL; Jia L; Yu Y; Xu W; Hu X; Zhan XH; Jia YW; Wang JJ; Cheng LM
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 55(4):279-284. PubMed ID: 28355766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease.
    Gu G; Zhang H; Fan G; He S; Cai X; Shen X; Guan X; Zhou X
    Int Orthop; 2014 Apr; 38(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 24240484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: Comparison Between Isthmic and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
    Kim JY; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1284-93. PubMed ID: 26072461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Multilevel: Comparison with Conventional Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lee WC; Park JY; Kim KH; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
    World Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 85():236-43. PubMed ID: 26386459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.