164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2261604)
1. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs.
Wenzel A; Fejerskov O; Kidd E; Joyston-Bechal S; Groeneveld A
Caries Res; 1990; 24(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 2261604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of occlusal caries without cavitation by visual inspection, film radiographs, xeroradiographs, and digitized radiographs.
Wenzel A; Larsen MJ; Fejerskov O
Caries Res; 1991; 25(5):365-71. PubMed ID: 1747887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Mikkelsen L; Mouyen F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 1745523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity of diagnosis of questionable caries lesions in occlusal surfaces of extracted third molars.
Wenzel A; Fejerskov O
Caries Res; 1992; 26(3):188-94. PubMed ID: 1628293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
Kimmes NS; Saini TS; Carroll LR
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of histological and radiographic depth and width of occlusal caries lesions: a methodological study.
Bakhshandeh A; Ekstrand KR; Qvist V
Caries Res; 2011; 45(6):547-55. PubMed ID: 22024919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
Janhom A; van Ginkel FC; van Amerongen JP; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors determining the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
Ohki M; Okano T; Nakamura T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 May; 23(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 7835507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital subtraction radiography after stannous fluoride treatment for occlusal caries diagnosis.
Wenzel A; Halse A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 1488242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tuned-aperture computed tomography for detection of occlusal caries.
Shi XQ; Han P; Welander U; Angmar-Månsson B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 11175273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.
Hintze H; Wenze A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 9084258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
Haak R; Wicht MJ; Nowak G; Hellmich M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of visual inspection, fiber-optic transillumination, and various radiographic image modalities for the detection of occlusal caries in extracted non-cavitated teeth.
Wenzel A; Verdonschot EH; Truin GJ; König KG
J Dent Res; 1992 Dec; 71(12):1934-7. PubMed ID: 1452897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
