These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2261604)

  • 21. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs.
    Yalcinkaya S; Künzel A; Willers R; Thoms M; Becker J
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 May; 101(5):643-51. PubMed ID: 16632278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
    Gotfredsen E; Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
    Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images.
    Kositbowornchai S; Basiw M; Promwang Y; Moragorn H; Sooksuntisakoonchai N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 15533977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
    Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of radiographic exposure factors on the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
    Skodje F; Espelid I; Kvile K; Tveit AB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 9656870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clarity and diagnostic quality of digitized conventional intraoral radiographs.
    Goga R; Chandler NP; Love RM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 15314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of digital grey-scale modification on the diagnosis of small approximal carious lesions.
    Verdonschot EH; Kuijpers JM; Polder BJ; De Leng-Worm MH; Bronkhorst EM
    J Dent; 1992 Feb; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 1548386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of image quality on radiographic diagnosis of approximal caries.
    Svenson B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1991; 74():1-62. PubMed ID: 2035145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro comparison of conventional film and direct digital imaging in the detection of approximal caries.
    Castro VM; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Mar; 36(3):138-42. PubMed ID: 17463097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Observer differentiation of proximal enamel mechanical defects versus natural proximal dental caries with computed dental radiography.
    Kang BC; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Oct; 82(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 8899789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography.
    Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An in vitro comparison of the ability of fibre-optic transillumination, visual inspection and radiographs to detect occlusal caries and evaluate lesion depth.
    Côrtes DF; Ekstrand KR; Elias-Boneta AR; Ellwood RP
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 11093016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
    Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.