These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2261604)

  • 41. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems.
    Jacobsen JH; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Hintze H
    Caries Res; 2004; 38(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 14684975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Impact of the validator and the validation method on the outcome of occlusal caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A; Verdonschot EH; Truin GJ; König KG
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):373-7. PubMed ID: 8001061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimation of clinical axial extension of Class II caries lesions with ultraspeed and digital radiographs: an in-vivo study.
    Bin-Shuwaish M; Dennison JB; Yaman P; Neiva G
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 19051853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Approximal carious lesion depth assessment with insight and ultraspeed films.
    Güngör K; Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Celik I; Semiz M
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 15765958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Reproducibility in the assessment of caries lesion behaviour: a comparison between conventional film and subtraction radiography.
    Wenzel A; Anthonisen PN; Juul MB
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10867419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE; Verheij JG; Syriopoulos K; Li G; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
    Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of quantum noise on the detection of incipient proximal caries.
    Okano T; Gröndahl HG; Gröndahl K; Webber RL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Feb; 53(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6949125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
    Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries.
    Sanden E; Koob A; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 12967070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
    Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
    Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections.
    Schulte AG; Wittchen A; Stachniss V; Jacquet W; Bottenberg P
    Caries Res; 2008; 42(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18063865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Digital enhancement of radiographs: can it improve caries diagnosis?
    Shrout MK; Russell CM; Potter BJ; Powell BJ; Hildebolt CF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Apr; 127(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 8655867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.