771 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616042)
1. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections after aging and chewing simulation.
Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Leutert CR; Sailer TR; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jan; 23(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 21443610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of zirconia-based implant abutments after artificial long-term aging.
Alsahhaf A; Spies BC; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Feb; 66():224-232. PubMed ID: 27915156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mechanical Stability of Restorations Supported by Titanium Base, Zirconia, and Polyetherketoneketone Abutments on One- and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants.
Cantarella J; Pitta J; Mojon P; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):313-321. PubMed ID: 33909721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro performance of zirconia and titanium implant/abutment systems for anterior application.
Rosentritt M; Hagemann A; Hahnel S; Behr M; Preis V
J Dent; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24699071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of the Titanium Base Abutment Design on Monolithic Zirconia Multiple-Unit Implant Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Laboratory Study.
Calderon U; Hicklin SP; Mojon P; Fehmer V; Nesic D; Mekki M; Sailer I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 35235616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance Behaviors of Titanium-Zirconium and Zirconia Implants.
Hanes B; Feitosa S; Phasuk K; Levon JA; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jun; 31(5):441-446. PubMed ID: 34632673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of fatigue loading on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate and zirconia implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Jan; 29(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 28664585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: a comparative in vitro study.
Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Güth JF; Erdelt K; Happe A; Beuer F
Dent Mater; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1215-20. PubMed ID: 23021964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis.
Coray R; Zeltner M; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Sep; 62():333-346. PubMed ID: 27239815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
