781 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616042)
41. In vitro performance of two-piece zirconia implant systems for anterior application.
Preis V; Kammermeier A; Handel G; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2016 Jun; 32(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 27068740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Fracture of Zirconia Abutment with Metallic Insertion on Anterior Single Titanium Implant with Internal Hexagon: Retrieval Analysis of a Failure.
Bottino MA; Rocha RFV; Anami LC; Özcan M; Marques de Melo R
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Sep; 24(3):164-168. PubMed ID: 28509509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of fracture strength and failure mode of different ceramic implant abutments.
Elsayed A; Wille S; Al-Akhali M; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 27769518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study.
Ekfeldt A; Fürst B; Carlsson GE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1308-14. PubMed ID: 21382085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions.
Zembic A; Bösch A; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Apr; 24(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 23025514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An In Vitro Evaluation of the Loosening of Different Interchangeable Abutments in Internal-Connection-Type Implants.
Park JM; Baek CH; Heo SJ; Kim SK; Koak JY; Kim SK; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):350-355. PubMed ID: 28291853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs.
Sen N; Us YO
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 31326150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Postfatigue fracture resistance of modified prefabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Alqahtani F; Flinton R
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):299-305. PubMed ID: 24461943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Strength and mode of failure of single implant all-ceramic abutment restorations under static load.
Tripodakis AP; Strub JR; Kappert HF; Witkowski S
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 10348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of clockwise and counterclockwise twisting moments on abutment screw loosening.
Yao KT; Kao HC; Cheng CK; Fang HW; Yip SW; Hsu ML
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1181-6. PubMed ID: 22092296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
Sui X; Wei H; Wang D; Han Y; Deng J; Wang Y; Wang J; Yang J
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.
Yilmaz B; Çakmak G; Batak B; Johnston WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 33938119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading.
Wiskott HW; Jaquet R; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 17465350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Implants with original and non-original abutment connections.
Gigandet M; Bigolin G; Faoro F; Bürgin W; Brägger U
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 22804848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Vertical Misfit of Single-Implant Abutments Made from Different Materials Under Cyclic Loading.
Butignon LE; de Almeida Basílio M; Santo JS; Arioli Filho JN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1017-22. PubMed ID: 27632255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
