610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616066)
1. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing implants in the nasal floor of dentate patients: a series of three cases.
Van der Meer WJ; Raghoebar GM; Gerrits PO; Noorda WD; Vissink A; Visser A
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 22545253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In Vivo Accuracy of Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning Modality and Stereolithographic Guides.
Skjerven H; Riis UH; Herlofsson BB; Ellingsen JE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 30695088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants.
Klein M; Hein A; Lueth T; Bier J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 14579960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot study in the human cadaver.
Noharet R; Pettersson A; Bourgeois D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 24721507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and accuracy of skin-supported surgical templates for computer-planned craniofacial implant placement, a comparison between surgical templates: With and without bony fixation.
Dings JPJ; Verhamme L; Maal TJJ; Merkx MAW; Meijer GJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 47(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 30905534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
Kiatkroekkrai P; Takolpuckdee C; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery.
Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology.
Shen P; Zhao J; Fan L; Qiu H; Xu W; Wang Y; Zhang S; Kim YJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2189-94. PubMed ID: 26776292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy evaluation of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in zygomatic implant placement in human cadavers.
Chrcanovic BR; Oliveira DR; Custódio AL
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(5):345-55. PubMed ID: 20545538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An Accuracy Study of Computer-Planned Implant Placement in the Augmented Maxilla Using Mucosa-Supported Surgical Templates.
Verhamme LM; Meijer GJ; Bergé SJ; Soehardi RA; Xi T; de Haan AF; Schutyser F; Maal TJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1154-63. PubMed ID: 25181255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
