423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616067)
1. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio, retention system, restorative material, and occlusal loading on stress concentrations in single short implants.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva WJ; Rocha EP; Del Bel Cury AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):e13-8. PubMed ID: 22616067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis.
Wang TM; Leu LJ; Wang J; Lin LD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11958406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown.
Sevimay M; Turhan F; Kiliçarslan MA; Eskitascioglu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 15775923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of crown to implant ratio and implant dimensions on periimplant stress of splinted implant-supported crowns: a finite element analysis.
Bayraktar M; Gultekin BA; Yalcin S; Mijiritsky E
Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 23823738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of metal-ceramic or all-ceramic superstructure materials on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes ÉA; Barão VA; Rocha EP; de Almeida ÉO; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1202-9. PubMed ID: 22167424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cemented versus screw-retained implant-supported single-tooth crowns: a 4-year prospective clinical study.
Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 15101598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads.
Aguiar FA; Tiossi R; Macedo AP; Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF; Rodrigues RC
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(7 Suppl 1):2019-23. PubMed ID: 23154374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Passivity versus unilateral angular misfit: evaluation of stress distribution on implant-supported single crowns: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Gomes EA; Assunção WG; Barão VA; Delben JA; Rocha EP; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1683-7. PubMed ID: 21119400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment planning of implants when 3 mandibular posterior teeth are missing: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Chen XY; Zhang CY; Nie EM; Zhang MC
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 22814561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant-supported first molar restorations: correlation of finite element analysis with clinical outcomes.
Ormianer Z; Palti A; Demiralp B; Heller G; Lewinstein I; Khayat PG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):e1-12. PubMed ID: 22299100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis.
Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF
Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Splinting effect on posterior implants under various loading modes: a 3D finite element analysis.
Hauchard E; Fournier BP; Jacq R; Bouton A; Pierrisnard L; Naveau A
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Sep; 19(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 22645793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type.
Gurgel-Juarez NC; de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Anchieta RB; de Vargas LC; Kina S; França FM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 22372756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of implant diameter, restoration design, and occlusal table variations on screw loosening of posterior single-tooth implant restorations.
Bakaeen LG; Winkler S; Neff PA
J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(2):63-72. PubMed ID: 12498429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
