162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616092)
1. Improving virtual channel discrimination in a multi-channel context.
Srinivasan AG; Shannon RV; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 286(1-2):19-29. PubMed ID: 22616092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients.
Landsberger DM; Srinivasan AG
Hear Res; 2009 Aug; 254(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 19383534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation.
Srinivasan AG; Landsberger DM; Shannon RV
Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 270(1-2):89-100. PubMed ID: 20850513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations.
Berenstein CK; Mens LH; Mulder JJ; Vanpoucke FJ
Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):250-60. PubMed ID: 18595189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Spectral Blurring to Assess Effects of Channel Interaction on Speech-in-Noise Perception with Cochlear Implants.
Goehring T; Arenberg JG; Carlyon RP
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2020 Aug; 21(4):353-371. PubMed ID: 32519088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations.
Carroll J; Zeng FG
Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):42-53. PubMed ID: 17604581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.
Langner F; Saoji AA; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():96-107. PubMed ID: 28104408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitch ranking with different virtual channel configurations in electrical hearing.
Padilla M; Stupak N; Landsberger DM
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():54-62. PubMed ID: 28216122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners.
Kong YY; Mullangi A; Marozeau J
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):645-59. PubMed ID: 22677814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maximizing the spectral and temporal benefits of two clinically used sound processing strategies for cochlear implants.
Won JH; Nie K; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 23264570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved perception of speech in noise and Mandarin tones with acoustic simulations of harmonic coding for cochlear implants.
Li X; Nie K; Imennov NS; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT; Atlas LE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3387-98. PubMed ID: 23145619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
