169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616544)
1. Quality of health care and the role of relationships: bridging the medico-legal divide.
Mor S; Einy OR
Health Matrix Clevel; 2012; 22(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 22616544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality control in health care: developments in the law of medical malpractice.
Furrow BR
Leg Med; 1994; ():83-131. PubMed ID: 7830487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?
Chupkovich PJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():337-75. PubMed ID: 10126943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Emergency room follow-up care and malpractice liability.
Morgan D
J Leg Med; 1995 Sep; 16(3):373-406. PubMed ID: 7595046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. No pain, no gain, no compensation: exploiting professional athletes through substandard medical care administered by team physicians.
DiCello N
Clevel State Law Rev; 2001; 49(3):507-38. PubMed ID: 15295834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reforming the relationship between medicine and the law of tort.
Gray N
J Law Med; 2004 Feb; 11(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 15018209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The law's 3 standards of informed consent.
Dunn LJ
Manag Care; 1994 Nov; 3(11):29-30. PubMed ID: 10141787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A legal crusader's solution to the malpractice mess. Interview by Wayne J. Guglielmo.
Howard PK
Med Econ; 2003 Jan; 80(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12602039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice litigation raises health-care cost, reduces access, and lowers quality of care.
J Med Pract Manage; 2004; 20(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 15500024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical liability, product liability, and the question of tort reform.
Ross-Lee B; Kiss L; Weiser MA
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1994 Dec; 94(12):1039-49. PubMed ID: 7852103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The nurse practitioner in malpractice actions: standard of care and theory of liability.
Baker SE
Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):325-55. PubMed ID: 10124882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in liability for cost containment-related medical decisions.
Peterson KF; Orenstein HR
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 10286481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The legal system, insurance, and health care. What can be done about the liability problem? An ECRI technology management assessment.
J Health Care Technol; 1986; 2(4):247-68. PubMed ID: 10276862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Practice guidelines as legal standards governing physician liability.
Havighurst CC
Law Contemp Probl; 1991; 54(1-2):Spring 87-117. PubMed ID: 10114977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Universal health care and the continued reliance on custom in determining medical malpractice.
Henderson JA; Siliciano JA
Cornell Law Rev; 1994 Sep; 79(6):1382-404. PubMed ID: 10141438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Legal implications of intraoperative consultation.
Irwin JR
Urol Clin North Am; 1985 Aug; 12(3):557-70. PubMed ID: 4024392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The doctor/patient relationship and immunity from malpractice.
Spector RA
J La State Med Soc; 2001 Oct; 153(10):501-3. PubMed ID: 18350709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Administrative compensation for medical injuries: lessons from three foreign systems.
Mello MM; Kachalia A; Studdert DM
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2011 Jul; 14():1-18. PubMed ID: 21770079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical malpractice: an overview of the English position.
Hodgson J
Ann Health Law; 1994; 3():225-42. PubMed ID: 10139980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
