227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616923)
1. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials.
Flury S; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 22616923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of different polishing techniques for direct CAD/CAM ceramic restorations.
Flury S; Lussi A; Zimmerli B
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 20672733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of artificial toothbrushing and water storage on the surface roughness and micromechanical properties of tooth-colored CAD-CAM materials.
Flury S; Diebold E; Peutzfeldt A; Lussi A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):767-774. PubMed ID: 27836147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Translucency of esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials and composite resins with respect to thickness and surface roughness.
Awad D; Stawarczyk B; Liebermann A; Ilie N
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 25749093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 1: Chairside materials.
Vichi A; Sedda M; Del Siena F; Louca C; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2013 Oct; 26(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 24479276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic.
Mohammadibassir M; Rezvani MB; Golzari H; Moravej Salehi E; Fahimi MA; Kharazi Fard MJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e172-e180. PubMed ID: 28273681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of mechanical properties of three machinable ceramics with an experimental fluorophlogopite glass ceramic.
Leung BT; Tsoi JK; Matinlinna JP; Pow EH
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):440-6. PubMed ID: 26013069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of CAD/CAM tool and material on tool wear and roughness of dental prostheses after milling.
Lebon N; Tapie L; Vennat E; Mawussi B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):236-47. PubMed ID: 25957240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of thermal and mechanical cycling on the mechanical strength and surface properties of dental CAD-CAM restorative materials.
Kim SH; Choi YS; Kang KH; Att W
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jul; 128(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 33546857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Postadjustment polishing of CAD-CAM ceramic with luminescence diamond gel.
Finger WJ; Noack MD
Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 11763906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials.
Lohbauer U; Müller FA; Petschelt A
Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 17628659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of select physical and mechanical properties of 3 machinable ceramic materials.
Charlton DG; Roberts HW; Tiba A
Quintessence Int; 2008; 39(7):573-9. PubMed ID: 19107265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: Outsourcing materials.
Sedda M; Vichi A; Del Siena F; Louca C; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2014 Feb; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 24902400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulation of CAD/CAM milling on lithium disilicate: Mechanical and topographic analyses of surface grinding different protocols.
Aragonez GC; Pilecco RO; Dapieve KS; Burgo TAL; Guilardi LF; Prochnow C; Valandro LF; Rippe MP
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Aug; 132():105278. PubMed ID: 35653917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure responses of a dental porcelain having three surface treatments under three stressing conditions.
Yi YJ; Kelly JR
Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1252-8. PubMed ID: 21975307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials.
Awada A; Nathanson D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 26141648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of machining on the flexural fatigue strength of glass and polycrystalline CAD/CAM ceramics.
Fraga S; Amaral M; Bottino MA; Valandro LF; Kleverlaan CJ; May LG
Dent Mater; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1286-1297. PubMed ID: 28818339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic (sodium aluminum silicate) composites for dental restoration.
Cui B; Li J; Wang H; Lin Y; Shen Y; Li M; Deng X; Nan C
J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():91-97. PubMed ID: 28526443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
