188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22616928)
1. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of silorane-based composite and nanohybrid composite with or without polyethylene fiber inserts in class II restorations: an in vitro study.
Agrawal VS; Parekh VV; Shah NC
Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):E1-7. PubMed ID: 22616928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of fiber reinforcement on microleakage of class II cavities restored with a novel G-aenial posterior composite, silorane composite, and nanohybrid composite: an in vitro comparative study.
Agrawal V; Kapoor S
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26748965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microleakage evaluation of Silorane-based composite and methacrylate-based composite in class II box preparations using two different layering techniques: an in vitro study.
Joseph A; Santhosh L; Hegde J; Panchajanya S; George R
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):148. PubMed ID: 23852255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
Ahmed W; El-Badrawy W; Kulkarni G; Prakki A; El-Mowafy O
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jul; 14(4):622-8. PubMed ID: 24309339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
Sadeghi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives.
Deliperi S; Bardwell DN; Wegley C
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 17427828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.
Krifka S; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Schmalz G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1117-24. PubMed ID: 21947906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities.
Ozel E; Soyman M
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(2):174-80. PubMed ID: 19363973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of a packable composite associated with different materials.
Loguercio AD; Bauer JR; Reis A; Rodrigues Filho LE; Busato AL
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 11887513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
Fourie J; Smit CF
SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of different monomer-based composites and acid etching pre-treatment of enamel on the microleakage using self-etch adhesives systems.
Catelan A; Giorgi MC; Soares GP; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Aguiar FH
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):651-5. PubMed ID: 24580091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations.
Hernandes NM; Catelan A; Soares GP; Ambrosano GM; Lima DA; Marchi GM; Martins LR; Aguiar FH
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):283-8. PubMed ID: 23946230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
