These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22617270)

  • 1. When is general wariness favored in avoiding multiple predator types?
    Brilot BO; Bateson M; Nettle D; Whittingham MJ; Read JC
    Am Nat; 2012 Jun; 179(6):E180-95. PubMed ID: 22617270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different chemical cues originating from a shared predator induce common defense responses in two prey species.
    Takahara T; Doi H; Kohmatsu Y; Yamaoka R
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Jan; 16(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 23065237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do responses of galliform birds vary adaptively with predator size?
    Palleroni A; Hauser M; Marler P
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Jul; 8(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 15660209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation.
    Kimbrell T; Holt RD; Lundberg P
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Nov; 249(2):218-34. PubMed ID: 17888456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rabbits protecting birds: Hypopredation and limitations of hyperpredation.
    Bate AM; Hilker FM
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Mar; 297():103-15. PubMed ID: 22182755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mixed encounters, limited perception and optimal foraging.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2000 Sep; 62(5):849-68. PubMed ID: 11016087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Referential calls signal predator behavior in a group-living bird species.
    Griesser M
    Curr Biol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 18177716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual variation in prey choice in a predator-prey community.
    Okuyama T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2011 May; 79(3):64-9. PubMed ID: 21354194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Background evolution in camouflage systems: a predator-prey/pollinator-flower game.
    Abbott KR
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Feb; 262(4):662-78. PubMed ID: 19747925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive forgetting in Iberian green frog tadpoles (Pelophylax perezi): learned irrelevance and latent inhibition may avoid predator misidentification.
    Gonzalo A; López P; Martín J
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 Feb; 127(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 22866772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prey behaviour across antipredator adaptation types: how does growth trajectory influence learning of predators?
    Ferrari MC; Brown GE; Bortolotti GR; Chivers DP
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Nov; 14(6):809-16. PubMed ID: 21556704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity can lead to stable predator-prey interaction.
    Mougi A; Kishida O
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Nov; 78(6):1172-81. PubMed ID: 19622080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Olfactory predator recognition in predator-naïve gray mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus).
    Sündermann D; Scheumann M; Zimmermann E
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 18489230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The positive effects of negative interactions: can avoidance of competitors or predators increase resource sampling by prey?
    Bell AV; Rader RB; Peck SL; Sih A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Aug; 76(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19371755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The optimal sampling strategy for unfamiliar prey.
    Sherratt TN
    Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2014-25. PubMed ID: 21729056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternative food, switching predators, and the persistence of predator-prey systems.
    van Baalen M; Krivan V; van Rijn PC; Sabelis MW
    Am Nat; 2001 May; 157(5):512-24. PubMed ID: 18707259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Die hard: a blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense--implications for the control of defensive behavior.
    Eilam D
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2005; 29(8):1181-91. PubMed ID: 16085311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
    Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice.
    Ma BO; Abrams PA; Brassil CE
    Am Nat; 2003 Nov; 162(5):668-84. PubMed ID: 14618543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impacts of foraging facilitation among predators on predator-prey dynamics.
    Berec L
    Bull Math Biol; 2010 Jan; 72(1):94-121. PubMed ID: 19697089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.