These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

947 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22617375)

  • 1. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
    Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
    Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of attention on the illusory capture of motion in bimodal stimuli.
    Oruc I; Sinnett S; Bischof WF; Soto-Faraco S; Lock K; Kingstone A
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1242():200-8. PubMed ID: 18514172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intramodal perceptual grouping modulates multisensory integration: evidence from the crossmodal dynamic capture task.
    Sanabria D; Soto-Faraco S; Chan J; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Mar; 377(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 15722188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating the in-between: multisensory integration of auditory and visual motion streams.
    Kluss T; Schult N; Schill K; Fahle M; Zetzsche C
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(1):45-69. PubMed ID: 22353568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oscillatory mechanisms underlying the enhancement of visual motion perception by multisensory congruency.
    Gleiss S; Kayser C
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():84-93. PubMed ID: 24262657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meaningful auditory information enhances perception of visual biological motion.
    Arrighi R; Marini F; Burr D
    J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):25.1-7. PubMed ID: 19757934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retinotopic effects during spatial audio-visual integration.
    Meienbrock A; Naumer MJ; Doehrmann O; Singer W; Muckli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 16797610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Feature-based processing of audio-visual synchrony perception revealed by random pulse trains.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(8):1075-93. PubMed ID: 17350068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory motion affects visual biological motion processing.
    Brooks A; van der Zwan R; Billard A; Petreska B; Clarke S; Blanke O
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 16504220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):372-84. PubMed ID: 20427031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilizing the ventriloquism-effect to investigate audio-visual binding.
    Bischoff M; Walter B; Blecker CR; Morgen K; Vaitl D; Sammer G
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):578-86. PubMed ID: 16620884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influences of intra- and crossmodal grouping on visual and tactile Ternus apparent motion.
    Chen L; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():152-62. PubMed ID: 20659437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors.
    Strybel TZ; Vatakis A
    Perception; 2004; 33(9):1033-48. PubMed ID: 15560506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities: an event-related potential study.
    Beer AL; Röder B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 21(4):1116-30. PubMed ID: 15787717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of audio-visual integration sites in humans by application of electrophysiological criteria to the BOLD effect.
    Calvert GA; Hansen PC; Iversen SD; Brammer MJ
    Neuroimage; 2001 Aug; 14(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 11467916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective integration of auditory-visual looming cues by humans.
    Cappe C; Thut G; Romei V; Murray MM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1045-52. PubMed ID: 19041883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 48.