These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22617400)

  • 1. Activity classification using the GENEA: optimum sampling frequency and number of axes.
    Zhang S; Murray P; Zillmer R; Eston RG; Catt M; Rowlands AV
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Nov; 44(11):2228-34. PubMed ID: 22617400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical activity classification using the GENEA wrist-worn accelerometer.
    Zhang S; Rowlands AV; Murray P; Hurst TL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Apr; 44(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 21988935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling frequency affects the processing of Actigraph raw acceleration data to activity counts.
    Brønd JC; Arvidsson D
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Feb; 120(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 26635347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of raw acceleration from the GENEA and ActiGraph™ GT3X+ activity monitors.
    John D; Sasaki J; Staudenmayer J; Mavilia M; Freedson PS
    Sensors (Basel); 2013 Oct; 13(11):14754-63. PubMed ID: 24177727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing cut-points for physical activity classification using triaxial accelerometer in middle-aged recreational marathoners.
    Hernando C; Hernando C; Collado EJ; Panizo N; Martinez-Navarro I; Hernando B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0202815. PubMed ID: 30157271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers.
    Ahmadi MN; Brookes D; Chowdhury A; Pavey T; Trost SG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2020 May; 52(5):1227-1234. PubMed ID: 31764460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer.
    Esliger DW; Rowlands AV; Hurst TL; Catt M; Murray P; Eston RG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jun; 43(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 21088628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of Activity Classification Algorithms in Free-Living Older Adults.
    Sasaki JE; Hickey AM; Staudenmayer JW; John D; Kent JA; Freedson PS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 May; 48(5):941-50. PubMed ID: 26673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refined two-regression model for the ActiGraph accelerometer.
    Crouter SE; Kuffel E; Haas JD; Frongillo EA; Bassett DR
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2010 May; 42(5):1029-37. PubMed ID: 20400882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children.
    Phillips LR; Parfitt G; Rowlands AV
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Mar; 16(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22770768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sampling rate on acceleration and counts of hip- and wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometers in children.
    Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Brønd J; Arvidsson D; Montoye AHK
    Physiol Meas; 2019 Sep; 40(9):095008. PubMed ID: 31518999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intensity Thresholds on Raw Acceleration Data: Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) and Mean Amplitude Deviation (MAD) Approaches.
    Bakrania K; Yates T; Rowlands AV; Esliger DW; Bunnewell S; Sanders J; Davies M; Khunti K; Edwardson CL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164045. PubMed ID: 27706241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A universal, accurate intensity-based classification of different physical activities using raw data of accelerometer.
    Vähä-Ypyä H; Vasankari T; Husu P; Suni J; Sievänen H
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2015 Jan; 35(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 24393233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recognition of activities in children by two uniaxial accelerometers in free-living conditions.
    Ruch N; Rumo M; Mäder U
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2011 Aug; 111(8):1917-27. PubMed ID: 21249388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading.
    Rowlands AV; Stiles VH
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 22218284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single-accelerometer-based daily physical activity classification.
    Long X; Yin B; Aarts RM
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6107-10. PubMed ID: 19965261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Examination of different accelerometer cut-points for assessing sedentary behaviors in children.
    Kim Y; Lee JM; Peters BP; Gaesser GA; Welk GJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e90630. PubMed ID: 24699259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of accelerometry to classify activity beneficial to bone in premenopausal women.
    Stiles VH; Griew PJ; Rowlands AV
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2013 Dec; 45(12):2353-61. PubMed ID: 23698245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of the Actical for estimating free-living physical activity.
    Crouter SE; Dellavalle DM; Horton M; Haas JD; Frongillo EA; Bassett DR
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2011 Jul; 111(7):1381-9. PubMed ID: 21153659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction models discriminating between nonlocomotive and locomotive activities in children using a triaxial accelerometer with a gravity-removal physical activity classification algorithm.
    Hikihara Y; Tanaka C; Oshima Y; Ohkawara K; Ishikawa-Takata K; Tanaka S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94940. PubMed ID: 24755646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.