These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22618209)

  • 1. Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.
    Ramanah R; Berger MB; Parratte BM; DeLancey JO
    Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1483-94. PubMed ID: 22618209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Study on morphological characteristics of uterosacral and cardinal ligament in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse based on MRI].
    Ma X; Shang S; Xie B; Sun X; Yang X; Wu J; Hong N; Wang J
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 50(9):668-72. PubMed ID: 26675393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A historical perspective and evolution of our knowledge on the cardinal ligament.
    Iancu G; Doumouchtsis SK
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Apr; 33(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 23754258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative histology of mouse, rat, and human pelvic ligaments.
    Iwanaga R; Orlicky DJ; Arnett J; Guess MK; Hurt KJ; Connell KA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 27091643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.
    Vu D; Haylen BT; Tse K; Farnsworth A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1123-8. PubMed ID: 20458468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Stress distribution and deformation of uterosacral ligament and cardinal ligament under different working conditions simulated by the finite element model].
    Ma XX; Shang SY; Xie B; Chang Y; Sun XL; Yang X; Wu J; Hong N; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 51(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 26917480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Histo-mechanical properties of the swine cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.
    Tan T; Davis FM; Gruber DD; Massengill JC; Robertson JL; De Vita R
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():129-37. PubMed ID: 25482216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cardinal ligament surgical anatomy: cardinal points at hysterectomy.
    Samaan A; Vu D; Haylen BT; Tse K
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Feb; 25(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 24170225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive Review of the Cardinal Ligament.
    Eid S; Iwanaga J; Oskouian RJ; Loukas M; Tubbs RS
    Cureus; 2018 Jun; 10(6):e2846. PubMed ID: 30140597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women.
    Chen L; Ramanah R; Hsu Y; Ashton-Miller JA; Delancey JO
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Jan; 24(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 22618207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Autonomic nerve trauma at radical hysterectomy: the nerve content and subtypes within the superficial and deep uterosacral ligaments.
    Butler-Manuel SA; Buttery LD; Polak JM; A'Hern R; Barton DP
    Reprod Sci; 2008 Jan; 15(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 18212359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic Nerve-Preserving Sacropexy.
    Ercoli A; Cosma S; Riboni F; Campagna G; Petruzzelli P; Surico D; Danese S; Scambia G; Benedetto C
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1075-1077. PubMed ID: 28323222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support.
    Kieserman-Shmokler C; Swenson CW; Chen L; Desmond LM; Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 31639371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pregnancy impact on uterosacral ligament and pelvic muscles using a 3D numerical and finite element model: preliminary results.
    Jean Dit Gautier E; Mayeur O; Lepage J; Brieu M; Cosson M; Rubod C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29188325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the uterine supporting ligaments.
    Butler-Manuel SA; Buttery LD; A'Hern RP; Polak JM; Barton DP
    J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2002; 9(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 11839509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Key anatomies of DeLancey's three levels of vaginal support theory: an observation in laparoscopic surgery].
    Zhao X; Chen G; Lei L; Wu X; Liu S; Wang J; Hu B; Lyu W
    Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 47(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 30511517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Micro-structural and Biaxial Creep Properties of the Swine Uterosacral-Cardinal Ligament Complex.
    Tan T; Cholewa NM; Case SW; De Vita R
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Nov; 44(11):3225-3237. PubMed ID: 27256362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using stress MRI to analyze the 3D changes in apical ligament geometry from rest to maximal Valsalva: a pilot study.
    Luo J; Betschart C; Chen L; Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Feb; 25(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 24008367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surgical anatomy imaging associated with cervical cancer treatment: A cadaveric study.
    Nakamura M; Fujii T; Imanishi N; Jinzaki M; Yamada M; Kuribayashi S; Aoki D
    Clin Anat; 2014 Apr; 27(3):503-10. PubMed ID: 24343837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.