233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22618209)
1. Anatomy and histology of apical support: a literature review concerning cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.
Ramanah R; Berger MB; Parratte BM; DeLancey JO
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1483-94. PubMed ID: 22618209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Study on morphological characteristics of uterosacral and cardinal ligament in patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse based on MRI].
Ma X; Shang S; Xie B; Sun X; Yang X; Wu J; Hong N; Wang J
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 50(9):668-72. PubMed ID: 26675393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A historical perspective and evolution of our knowledge on the cardinal ligament.
Iancu G; Doumouchtsis SK
Neurourol Urodyn; 2014 Apr; 33(4):380-6. PubMed ID: 23754258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative histology of mouse, rat, and human pelvic ligaments.
Iwanaga R; Orlicky DJ; Arnett J; Guess MK; Hurt KJ; Connell KA
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 27091643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical anatomy of the uterosacral ligament.
Vu D; Haylen BT; Tse K; Farnsworth A
Int Urogynecol J; 2010 Sep; 21(9):1123-8. PubMed ID: 20458468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Stress distribution and deformation of uterosacral ligament and cardinal ligament under different working conditions simulated by the finite element model].
Ma XX; Shang SY; Xie B; Chang Y; Sun XL; Yang X; Wu J; Hong N; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Feb; 51(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 26917480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histo-mechanical properties of the swine cardinal and uterosacral ligaments.
Tan T; Davis FM; Gruber DD; Massengill JC; Robertson JL; De Vita R
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():129-37. PubMed ID: 25482216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardinal ligament surgical anatomy: cardinal points at hysterectomy.
Samaan A; Vu D; Haylen BT; Tse K
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Feb; 25(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 24170225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive Review of the Cardinal Ligament.
Eid S; Iwanaga J; Oskouian RJ; Loukas M; Tubbs RS
Cureus; 2018 Jun; 10(6):e2846. PubMed ID: 30140597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cardinal and deep uterosacral ligament lines of action: MRI based 3D technique development and preliminary findings in normal women.
Chen L; Ramanah R; Hsu Y; Ashton-Miller JA; Delancey JO
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Jan; 24(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 22618207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Autonomic nerve trauma at radical hysterectomy: the nerve content and subtypes within the superficial and deep uterosacral ligaments.
Butler-Manuel SA; Buttery LD; Polak JM; A'Hern R; Barton DP
Reprod Sci; 2008 Jan; 15(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 18212359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic Nerve-Preserving Sacropexy.
Ercoli A; Cosma S; Riboni F; Campagna G; Petruzzelli P; Surico D; Danese S; Scambia G; Benedetto C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1075-1077. PubMed ID: 28323222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Key anatomies of DeLancey's three levels of vaginal support theory: an observation in laparoscopic surgery].
Zhao X; Chen G; Lei L; Wu X; Liu S; Wang J; Hu B; Lyu W
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Feb; 47(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 30511517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. From molecular to macro: the key role of the apical ligaments in uterovaginal support.
Kieserman-Shmokler C; Swenson CW; Chen L; Desmond LM; Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):427-436. PubMed ID: 31639371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pregnancy impact on uterosacral ligament and pelvic muscles using a 3D numerical and finite element model: preliminary results.
Jean Dit Gautier E; Mayeur O; Lepage J; Brieu M; Cosson M; Rubod C
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Mar; 29(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 29188325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical and simple hysterectomy: a quantitative study of nerve types in the uterine supporting ligaments.
Butler-Manuel SA; Buttery LD; A'Hern RP; Polak JM; Barton DP
J Soc Gynecol Investig; 2002; 9(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 11839509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Micro-structural and Biaxial Creep Properties of the Swine Uterosacral-Cardinal Ligament Complex.
Tan T; Cholewa NM; Case SW; De Vita R
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Nov; 44(11):3225-3237. PubMed ID: 27256362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using stress MRI to analyze the 3D changes in apical ligament geometry from rest to maximal Valsalva: a pilot study.
Luo J; Betschart C; Chen L; Ashton-Miller JA; DeLancey JO
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Feb; 25(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 24008367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical anatomy imaging associated with cervical cancer treatment: A cadaveric study.
Nakamura M; Fujii T; Imanishi N; Jinzaki M; Yamada M; Kuribayashi S; Aoki D
Clin Anat; 2014 Apr; 27(3):503-10. PubMed ID: 24343837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
