These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22618476)
1. Application of classification trees for the qualitative differentiation of focal liver lesions suspicious for metastasis in gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging. Schelhorn J; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Burmeister HP; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):788-94. PubMed ID: 22618476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion weighted imaging of liver lesions suspect for metastases: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lesion contrast are independent from Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. Benndorf M; Schelhorn J; Dietzel M; Kaiser WA; Baltzer PA Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e849-53. PubMed ID: 22575171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and confidence of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging alone and in combination for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Donati OF; Fischer MA; Chuck N; Hunziker R; Weishaupt D; Reiner CS Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):822-8. PubMed ID: 23287713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MR imaging and prognosis of borderline lesions of hepatocellular carcinoma. Kobayashi S; Matsui O; Gabata T; Koda W; Minami T; Ryu Y; Kozaka K; Kitao A Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3002-9. PubMed ID: 22748558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection and classification of different liver lesions: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinical single centre investigation. Böttcher J; Hansch A; Pfeil A; Schmidt P; Malich A; Schneeweiss A; Maurer MH; Streitparth F; Teichgräber UK; Renz DM Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1860-9. PubMed ID: 23932636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents. Husarik DB; Gupta RT; Ringe KI; Boll DT; Merkle EM Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1549-54. PubMed ID: 21958599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which is the best MRI marker of malignancy for atypical cirrhotic nodules: hypointensity in hepatobiliary phase alone or combined with other features? Classification after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. Golfieri R; Grazioli L; Orlando E; Dormi A; Lucidi V; Corcioni B; Dettori E; Romanini L; Renzulli M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Sep; 36(3):648-57. PubMed ID: 22592930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of fast dynamic imaging and the use of Gd-EOB-DTPA for MR-guided liver interventions. Fischbach F; Thormann M; Seidensticker M; Kropf S; Pech M; Ricke J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Oct; 34(4):874-9. PubMed ID: 21769983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: evaluation of the effect in signal intensity after Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement. Tamada T; Ito K; Yoshida K; Sone T; Murakami K; Kanki A; Watanabe S; Higashi H; Yamashita T J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 20351500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Imaging features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Péporté AR; Sommer WH; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Zech CJ Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):e101-6. PubMed ID: 23159401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission technology: Comparison with the post-processing correction method for B1 inhomogeneity-induced signal loss. Takayama Y; Nishie A; Asayama Y; Ishigami K; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Hirakawa M; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3035-40. PubMed ID: 22578836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organ-focused mutual information for nonrigid multimodal registration of liver CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Fernandez-de-Manuel L; Wollny G; Kybic J; Jimenez-Carretero D; Tellado JM; Ramon E; Desco M; Santos A; Pascau J; Ledesma-Carbayo MJ Med Image Anal; 2014 Jan; 18(1):22-35. PubMed ID: 24080528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Tamada T; Ito K; Sone T; Yamamoto A; Yoshida K; Kakuba K; Tanimoto D; Higashi H; Yamashita T J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):636-40. PubMed ID: 19243060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between areas with Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake and without in hepatocellular carcinomas on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MR imaging: pathological correlation. Lee S; Kim SH; Park CK; Kim YS; Lee WJ; Lim HK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 32(3):719-25. PubMed ID: 20815073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New proposal for the staging of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: evaluation of liver fibrosis on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Tsuda N; Okada M; Murakami T Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jan; 73(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19026502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: prediction of hepatic fibrosis stages using liver contrast enhancement index and liver-to-spleen volumetric ratio. Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Watanabe H; Kondo H; Kawada H; Moriyama N; Bae KT J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Nov; 36(5):1148-53. PubMed ID: 22848019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Donati OF; Hany TF; Reiner CS; von Schulthess GK; Marincek B; Seifert B; Weishaupt D J Nucl Med; 2010 May; 51(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 20395324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic MRI of solitary pulmonary nodules: comparison of enhancement patterns of malignant and benign small peripheral lung lesions. Kono R; Fujimoto K; Terasaki H; Müller NL; Kato S; Sadohara J; Hayabuchi N; Takamori S AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 17179342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]