These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22618597)
1. The importance of rating scale design in the measurement of patient-reported outcomes using questionnaires or item banks. Khadka J; McAlinden C; Gothwal VK; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Jun; 53(7):4042-54. PubMed ID: 22618597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Item banking: a generational change in patient-reported outcome measurement. Pesudovs K Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Apr; 87(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 20142792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Catquest-9SF patient outcomes questionnaire: nine-item short-form Rasch-scaled revision of the Catquest questionnaire. Lundström M; Pesudovs K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 19251145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maintaining instrument quality while reducing items: application of Rasch analysis to a self-report of visual function. Velozo CA; Lai JS; Mallinson T; Hauselman E J Outcome Meas; 2000-2001; 4(3):667-80. PubMed ID: 11253902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activities of Daily Vision Scale: what do the subscales measure? Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Feb; 51(2):694-700. PubMed ID: 19684011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual Activities Questionnaire: assessment of subscale validity for cataract surgery outcomes. Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1961-9. PubMed ID: 19878830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of cataract surgery questionnaire: re-evaluation using Rasch analysis. Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 89(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 19878121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric Properties of an Indian Translation of the Vision-related Activity Limitation Item Bank in Cataract. Gothwal VK; Muthineni VV; Khadka J; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K; Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Dec; 96(12):910-919. PubMed ID: 31834150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Coster WJ; Haley SM; Andres PL; Ludlow LH; Bond TL; Ni PS Med Care; 2004 Jan; 42(1 Suppl):I62-72. PubMed ID: 14707756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of the 10-item vision core measure 1 (VCM1) scale (the Core Module of the Vision-Related Quality of Life scale) using Rasch analysis. Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K; Pallant JF; Rees G; Hassell JB; Caudle LE; Keeffe JE Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(4):224-33. PubMed ID: 18780255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the visual disability questionnaire (VDQ) in India. Marella M; Gothwal VK; Pesudovs K; Lamoureux E Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jul; 86(7):E826-35. PubMed ID: 19543138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring outcomes of cataract surgery using the Visual Function Index-14. Gothwal VK; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1181-8. PubMed ID: 20610098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A head-to-head comparison of 16 cataract surgery outcome questionnaires. McAlinden C; Gothwal VK; Khadka J; Wright TA; Lamoureux EL; Pesudovs K Ophthalmology; 2011 Dec; 118(12):2374-81. PubMed ID: 21945088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score (ALDS) item bank: item response theory analysis in a mixed patient population. Holman R; Weisscher N; Glas CA; Dijkgraaf MG; Vermeulen M; de Haan RJ; Lindeboom R Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Dec; 3():83. PubMed ID: 16381611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Translation, cultural adaptation, and Rasch analysis of the visual function (VF-14) questionnaire. Khadka J; Huang J; Mollazadegan K; Gao R; Chen H; Zhang S; Wang Q; Pesudovs K Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jun; 55(7):4413-20. PubMed ID: 24917139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of a visual impairment questionnaire in measuring cataract surgery outcomes. Pesudovs K; Caudle LE; Rees G; Lamoureux EL J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):925-33. PubMed ID: 18498997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rasch analysis reveals problems with multiplicative scoring in the macular disease quality of life questionnaire. Finger RP; Fenwick E; Pesudovs K; Marella M; Lamoureux EL; Holz FG Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2351-7. PubMed ID: 22968142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study. Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological studies of orofacial aesthetics, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life. Larsson P Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (204):11-98. PubMed ID: 20623943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]