191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22618718)
1. The New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system for adenocarcinoma of the stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy.
Dikken JL; van de Velde CJ; Gönen M; Verheij M; Brennan MF; Coit DG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):2443-51. PubMed ID: 22618718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].
Kim SS; Choi BY; Seo SI; Jung MY; Choi HS; Ahn SM; Choi WH; Kim HS; Kim KH; Jang MK; Lee JH; Kim HY; Shin WG
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2011 Nov; 58(5):258-63. PubMed ID: 22113042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.
Qiu MZ; Wang ZQ; Zhang DS; Liu Q; Luo HY; Zhou ZW; Li YH; Jiang WQ; Xu RH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Jul; 18(7):1869-76. PubMed ID: 21246404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.
Sun Z; Wang ZN; Zhu Z; Xu YY; Xu Y; Huang BJ; Zhu GL; Xu HM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1918-27. PubMed ID: 22246426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results of a Chinese single-institution study of 1,503 patients.
Wang W; Sun XW; Li CF; Lv L; Li YF; Chen YB; Xu DZ; Kesari R; Huang CY; Li W; Zhan YQ; Zhou ZW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Apr; 18(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 21107742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the survival difference between AJCC 6th and 7th editions for gastric cancer patients.
Fang WL; Huang KH; Chen JH; Lo SS; Hsieh MC; Shen KH; Li AF; Niu DM; Chiou SH; Wu CW
World J Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(12):2723-9. PubMed ID: 21918892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the 6th and 7th Editions of the UICC-AJCC TNM Classification for Esophageal Cancer.
Talsma K; van Hagen P; Grotenhuis BA; Steyerberg EW; Tilanus HW; van Lanschot JJ; Wijnhoven BP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2142-8. PubMed ID: 22395974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System Sufficiently Reasonable for All Patients with Noncardia Gastric Cancer? A 12,549-Patient International Database Study.
Lu J; Zheng ZF; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Li P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 25(7):2002-2011. PubMed ID: 29725896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prognosis of 980 patients with gastric cancer after surgical resection.
Wang W; Li YF; Sun XW; Chen YB; Li W; Xu DZ; Guan XX; Huang CY; Zhan YQ; Zhou ZW
Chin J Cancer; 2010 Nov; 29(11):923-30. PubMed ID: 20979691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the proposals of the international association for the study of lung cancer in the forthcoming edition of lung cancer staging system to predict long-term prognosis of operated patients.
Rena O; Massera F; Robustellini M; Papalia E; Delfanti R; Lisi E; Pirondini E; Turello D; Casadio C
Cancer J; 2010; 16(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 20404615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.
Jun KH; Lee JS; Kim JH; Kim JJ; Chin HM; Park SM
Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):893-6. PubMed ID: 25026311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gastric cardiac carcinomas involving the esophagus are more adequately staged as gastric cancers by the 7th edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging System.
Huang Q; Shi J; Feng A; Fan X; Zhang L; Mashimo H; Cohen D; Lauwers G
Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 20852593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The New American Joint Committee on Cancer T staging system for stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy for endoscopic ultrasound.
Han C; Xu T; Zhang Q; Liu J; Ding Z; Hou X
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Jun; 21(1):255. PubMed ID: 34116629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].
Shi GD; Luo ZL; Fu MY; Tian D; Zhang L; Zhang KP
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2014 Dec; 36(12):916-21. PubMed ID: 25623766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC staging system for T1 gastric cancer: a long-term follow-up study of 2124 patients.
Choi KH; Kim BS; Oh ST; Yook JH; Kim BS
Gastric Cancer; 2017 Jan; 20(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 26732877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.
Chae S; Lee A; Lee JH
Gastric Cancer; 2011 Jun; 14(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 21360132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.
Chen MW; Chan CP; Lin YJ; Yen HH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0211836. PubMed ID: 30721261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
