BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2261935)

  • 1. Management of painful caliceal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lee MH; Lee YH; Chen MT; Huang JK; Chang LS
    Eur Urol; 1990; 18(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 2261935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower caliceal stones in children compared with stones in other renal locations.
    Demirkesen O; Onal B; Tansu N; Altintaş R; Yalçin V; Oner A
    Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):170-4; discussion 174-5. PubMed ID: 16413356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for isolated lower pole calculi compared with isolated middle and upper caliceal calculi.
    Obek C; Onal B; Kantay K; Kalkan M; Yalçin V; Oner A; Solok V; Tansu N
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2081-4; discussion 2085. PubMed ID: 11696710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment of caliceal diverticular calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: patient selection and extended followup.
    Streem SB; Yost A
    J Urol; 1992 Sep; 148(3 Pt 2):1043-6. PubMed ID: 1507327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment of painful caliceal stones.
    Coury TA; Sonda LP; Lingeman JE; Kahnoski RJ
    Urology; 1988 Aug; 32(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 3400135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
    El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
    BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small caliceal stones: is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy justified?
    Mee SL; Thuroff JW
    J Urol; 1988 May; 139(5):908-10. PubMed ID: 3361660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Renal calculi in lower pole calices: what is the best method of treatment?
    Netto NR; Claro JF; Lemos GC; Cortado PL
    J Urol; 1991 Sep; 146(3):721-3. PubMed ID: 1875480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.
    Elbahnasy AM; Shalhav AL; Hoenig DM; Elashry OM; Smith DS; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 9474124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Predictive factors of successful treatment of lower caliceal calculi with Edap LT02 extracorporeal lithotripsy].
    Nouri M; Tligui M; Haab F; Flahaut A; Gattegno B; Thibault P
    Prog Urol; 2000 Sep; 10(4):529-36. PubMed ID: 11064892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of stones in caliceal diverticula: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.
    Hendrikx AJ; Bierkens AF; Bos R; Oosterhof GO; Debruyne FM
    Br J Urol; 1992 Nov; 70(5):478-82. PubMed ID: 1467848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Usefulness of lower ihfundibular length-to-diameter ratio as a predictor of lower pole stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; clinical research with two lithotriptors].
    Sumino Y; Mimata H; Tasaki Y; Satoh F; Emoto A; Nomura Y; Sakamoto S; Iwashita K
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 94(6):608-13. PubMed ID: 14531270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Caliceal stones:What did we learned after 10 years of ESWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy)].
    Pricop C; Novac C; Negru I; Negru D; Tomac I
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2003; 107(1):157-62. PubMed ID: 14755988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does size and site matter for renal stones up to 30-mm in size in children treated by extracorporeal lithotripsy?
    Ather MH; Noor MA
    Urology; 2003 Jan; 61(1):212-5; discussion 215. PubMed ID: 12559298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?
    Danuser H; Müller R; Descoeudres B; Dobry E; Studer UE
    Eur Urol; 2007 Aug; 52(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 17400366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy retreatment ("stir-up") promotes discharge of persistent caliceal stone fragments after primary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Krings F; Tuerk C; Steinkogler I; Marberger M
    J Urol; 1992 Sep; 148(3 Pt 2):1040-1; discussion 1041-2. PubMed ID: 1507326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is lower pole caliceal anatomy predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success for primary lower pole kidney stones?
    Sorensen CM; Chandhoke PS
    J Urol; 2002 Dec; 168(6):2377-82; discussion 2382. PubMed ID: 12441921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.
    Onal B; Demirkesen O; Tansu N; Kalkan M; Altintaş R; Yalçin V
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 15311043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomized trial of management for asymptomatic lower pole calculi.
    Yuruk E; Binbay M; Sari E; Akman T; Altinyay E; Baykal M; Muslumanoglu AY; Tefekli A
    J Urol; 2010 Apr; 183(4):1424-8. PubMed ID: 20172565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower caliceal calculi.
    Küpeli B; Biri H; Sinik Z; Karaca K; Tuncayengin A; Karaoğlan U; Bozkirli I
    Eur Urol; 1998 Sep; 34(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 9732193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.