These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22619896)

  • 1. Reliability of visual acuity measurements taken with a notebook and a tablet computer in participants who were illiterate to Roman characters.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Sudsakorn N; Somkijrungroj T; Engkagul C; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Mar; 95 Suppl 3():S109-16. PubMed ID: 22619896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pilot trial of the iPad tablet computer as a portable device for visual acuity testing.
    Zhang ZT; Zhang SC; Huang XG; Liang LY
    J Telemed Telecare; 2013 Jan; 19(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 23434538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Desktop publishing and validation of custom near visual acuity charts.
    Marran L; Liu L; Lau G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1082-90. PubMed ID: 18981923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determination of far vision with DIN 58220 (criterion 6/10): computer vision test with high resolution monitor in comparison with vision charts].
    Hautzinger S; Haase W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Dec; 211(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 9498189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
    Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
    Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Objective assessment of minimum visual acuity by suppression of optokinetic nystagmus].
    Gräf M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Apr; 212(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 9644664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.
    Schulze-Bonsel K; Feltgen N; Burau H; Hansen L; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity.
    Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Shah SP; Sivasubramaniam S; Bunce C; Cousens S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9397-402. PubMed ID: 22003109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of test medium on use of visual analogue scales.
    Woods CA; Cumming B
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jan; 35(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19125041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
    Veselý P; Synek S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
    Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repeatability of an automated Landolt C test, compared with the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) chart testing.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M; Kunawut C; Masayaanon P
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 14516806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of visual acuity charts in young adults and patients with diabetic retinopathy.
    Plainis S; Kontadakis G; Feloni E; Giannakopoulou T; Tsilimbaris MK; Pallikaris IG; Moschandreas J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 90(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 23314130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Higher risk of multiple falls among elderly women who lose visual acuity.
    Coleman AL; Stone K; Ewing SK; Nevitt M; Cummings S; Cauley JA; Ensrud KE; Harris EL; Hochberg MC; Mangione CM
    Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):857-62. PubMed ID: 15121359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability of three different visual acuity testing procedures in school children.
    Schmidt-Bacher A; Pritsch M; Kolling G
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17523045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
    Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repeatability (test-retest variability) of refractive error measurement in clinical settings.
    Leinonen J; Laakkonen E; Laatikainen L
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Aug; 84(4):532-6. PubMed ID: 16879577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of visual acuity assessment in normal and low visual acuity.
    Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
    Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.