These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Implications of recent US Supreme Court IP ruling for nanomedicine patents. Kim KY Nanomedicine (Lond); 2008 Apr; 3(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 18373420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Isolated DNA patent ban creates muddy waters for biomarkers and natural products. Harrison C Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2013 Aug; 12(8):570-1. PubMed ID: 23903213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Take off your genes and let the doctor have a look: why the Mayo and Myriad decisions have invalidated method claims for genetic diagnostic testing. Bergin C Am Univ Law Rev; 2013; 63(1):173-217. PubMed ID: 25335200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Muddying the waters: how the Supreme Court's decision in Merck v. Integra fails to resolve problems of judicial interpretation of 35 U.S.C. Section 271(E)(1), the "safe harbor" provision of the Hatch-Waxman Act. Sertic M Health Matrix Clevel; 2007; 17(2):377-439. PubMed ID: 18326397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents. Robertson D Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable. Marshall E Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme Court decision on patent for HIV test unlikely to set major precedent. Waters H Nat Med; 2011 Jul; 17(7):758. PubMed ID: 21738136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic method patents and harms to follow-on innovation. Harv Law Rev; 2013 Mar; 126(5):1370-91. PubMed ID: 25330558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Intellectual property. What good is a patent? Supreme Court may suggest an answer. Kintisch E Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5763):946-7. PubMed ID: 16484470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Intellectual property. Supreme Court to review the scope of Monsanto's seed patents. Marshall E Science; 2013 Feb; 339(6120):639. PubMed ID: 23393238 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The patentability of living matter: Hey waiter, what's Chakrabarty's pseudomonas bacterium doing back in the Supreme Court's soup? Rayson GS Wash Lee Law Rev; 1980; 37(1):183-200. PubMed ID: 11662809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US Supreme Court may have to settle dispute over patenting DNA sequences. Dyer C BMJ; 2011 Sep; 343():d6187. PubMed ID: 21952463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]