These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2262185)

  • 1. [A critical analysis of the SNA, SNB and ANB angles in assessing orthodontic treatments].
    Pancherz H; Sack B
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1990 Oct; 51(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 2262185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of the Herbst appliance for patients with Class II malocclusion: a meta-analysis.
    Yang X; Zhu Y; Long H; Zhou Y; Jian F; Ye N; Gao M; Lai W
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 38(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 26306822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical headgear treatment and growth patterns: analysis by lateral cephalometry.
    Godt A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 Jan; 68(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 17238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cephalometric study of the effect of orthodontic treatment on the mandible in Class II, Division 1 patients].
    Atta JY; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 2135330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the predictability of ANB, 1-NB, P-NB and 1-NA measurements on Steiner cephalometric analysis.
    Navarro AC; Carreiro LS; Rossato C; Takahashi R; Lima CE
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 23916442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
    Hägglund P; Segerdal S; Forsberg CM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cephalometric assessment of the axial inclination of upper and lower incisors in relation to the third-order angle.
    Knösel M; Attin R; Kubein-Meesenburg D; Sadat-Khonsari R
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 17522804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Late adult skeletofacial growth after adolescent Herbst therapy: a 32-year longitudinal follow-up study.
    Pancherz H; Bjerklin K; Hashemi K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 25533068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Eastman correction over- or under-adjust ANB for positional changes of N?
    Kamaluddin JM; Cobourne MT; Sherriff M; Bister D
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 21926313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study.
    Jakobsson SO; Paulin G
    Eur J Orthod; 1990 May; 12(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 2351202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Skeletal stability of patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
    Lee SH; Kaban LB; Lahey ET
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 73(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 25622883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis.
    Martinez P; Bellot-Arcís C; Llamas JM; Cibrian R; Gandia JL; Paredes-Gallardo V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(4):490-495. PubMed ID: 28034574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vertical changes in treated and untreated Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Sharp C; Harkness M; Herbison P
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 Nov; 23(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18200789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of extraction orthodontic treatment on craniofacial structures: evaluation according to two different factors.
    Taner-Sarisoy L; Darendeliler N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 May; 115(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 10229882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overjet reduction and molar correction in fixed appliance treatment of class II, division 1, malocclusions: sagittal and vertical components.
    Nelson B; Hansen K; Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 9878953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects.
    Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S; Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):357-73. PubMed ID: 8529749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB.
    Hussels W; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):411-23. PubMed ID: 6586080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The reliability of 3 sagittal reference planes in the assessment of Class I and Class III treatment.
    Palleck S; Foley TF; Hall-Scott J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):426-35. PubMed ID: 11298316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison of skeletal changes between adult and adolescent with skeletal class II malocclusions before and after therapy].
    Zhao JH; Ding Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2010 Oct; 42(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 20957019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.