These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22621993)

  • 1. Blinded measure of Trendelenburg angle in pelvic robotic surgery.
    Gould C; Cull T; Wu YX; Osmundsen B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 22621993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery.
    Ghomi A; Kramer C; Askari R; Chavan NR; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Awad H; Santilli S; Ohr M; Roth A; Yan W; Fernandez S; Roth S; Patel V
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 19608821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of the degree of head-down angle during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Kadono Y; Yaegashi H; Machioka K; Ueno S; Miwa S; Maeda Y; Miyagi T; Mizokami A; Fujii Y; Tsubokawa T; Yamamoto K; Namiki M
    Int J Med Robot; 2013 Mar; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23348954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraocular pressure and steep Trendelenburg during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: is there a risk?
    Borahay MA; Patel PR; Walsh TM; Tarnal V; Koutrouvelis A; Vizzeri G; Jennings K; Jerig S; Kilic GS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 23941744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position.
    Lestar M; Gunnarsson L; Lagerstrand L; Wiklund P; Odeberg-Wernerman S
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):1069-75. PubMed ID: 21233502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic presacral neurectomy: feasibility, techniques, and operative outcomes.
    Nezhat C; Morozov V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20621011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
    Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures.
    Klauschie J; Wechter ME; Jacob K; Zanagnolo V; Montero R; Magrina J; Kho R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):504-7. PubMed ID: 20471916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Trendelenburg Angles in Vaginal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Uterovaginal Apical Prolapse Repairs.
    Jaresova A; Warda H; Macharia A; Hacker MR; Li J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 33857670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
    Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-operative alopecia after robotic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position: a restated observation of pressure alopecia.
    Gollapalli L; Papapetrou P; Gupta D; Fuleihan SF
    Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 22(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 24649795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pulmonary gas exchange is well preserved during robot assisted surgery in steep Trendelenburg position.
    Schrijvers D; Mottrie A; Traen K; De Wolf AM; Vandermeersch E; Kalmar AF; Hendrickx JF
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2009; 60(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 20187485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?
    Nezhat C; Lavie O; Lemyre M; Unal E; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2620-2. PubMed ID: 18656185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.