189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22621993)
1. Blinded measure of Trendelenburg angle in pelvic robotic surgery.
Gould C; Cull T; Wu YX; Osmundsen B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):465-8. PubMed ID: 22621993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trendelenburg position in gynecologic robotic-assisted surgery.
Ghomi A; Kramer C; Askari R; Chavan NR; Einarsson JI
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 22748954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of steep trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy.
Awad H; Santilli S; Ohr M; Roth A; Yan W; Fernandez S; Roth S; Patel V
Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 19608821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of the degree of head-down angle during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Kadono Y; Yaegashi H; Machioka K; Ueno S; Miwa S; Maeda Y; Miyagi T; Mizokami A; Fujii Y; Tsubokawa T; Yamamoto K; Namiki M
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Mar; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23348954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraocular pressure and steep Trendelenburg during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery: is there a risk?
Borahay MA; Patel PR; Walsh TM; Tarnal V; Koutrouvelis A; Vizzeri G; Jennings K; Jerig S; Kilic GS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(6):819-24. PubMed ID: 23941744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45° Trendelenburg position.
Lestar M; Gunnarsson L; Lagerstrand L; Wiklund P; Odeberg-Wernerman S
Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):1069-75. PubMed ID: 21233502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted laparoscopic presacral neurectomy: feasibility, techniques, and operative outcomes.
Nezhat C; Morozov V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 20621011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases: experience of Tri-Service General Hospital in Taiwan.
Tan SJ; Lin CK; Fu PT; Liu YL; Sun CC; Chang CC; Yu MH; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 22482963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of anti-skid material and patient-positioning to prevent patient shifting during robotic-assisted gynecologic procedures.
Klauschie J; Wechter ME; Jacob K; Zanagnolo V; Montero R; Magrina J; Kho R
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):504-7. PubMed ID: 20471916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Trendelenburg Angles in Vaginal, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Uterovaginal Apical Prolapse Repairs.
Jaresova A; Warda H; Macharia A; Hacker MR; Li J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 28(11):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 33857670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post-operative alopecia after robotic surgery in steep Trendelenburg position: a restated observation of pressure alopecia.
Gollapalli L; Papapetrou P; Gupta D; Fuleihan SF
Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Oct; 22(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 24649795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulmonary gas exchange is well preserved during robot assisted surgery in steep Trendelenburg position.
Schrijvers D; Mottrie A; Traen K; De Wolf AM; Vandermeersch E; Kalmar AF; Hendrickx JF
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2009; 60(4):229-33. PubMed ID: 20187485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?
Nezhat C; Lavie O; Lemyre M; Unal E; Nezhat CH; Nezhat F
Fertil Steril; 2009 Jun; 91(6):2620-2. PubMed ID: 18656185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
