188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22621993)
21. Safety and Effectiveness of SAF-R, a Novel Patient Positioning Device for Robot-Assisted Pelvic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position.
Talab SS; Elmi A; Sarma J; Barrisford GW; Tabatabaei S
J Endourol; 2016 Mar; 30(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 26531773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic assisted prostatic surgery in the Trendelenburg position does not impair cerebral oxygenation measured using two different monitors: A clinical observational study.
Closhen D; Treiber AH; Berres M; Sebastiani A; Werner C; Engelhard K; Schramm P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 Feb; 31(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 24225725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Analysis of the impact of body mass index on the surgical outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy.
George A; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(6):730-3. PubMed ID: 19896599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.
Mohr CJ; Nadzam GS; Curet MJ
Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):779-86. PubMed ID: 16103289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. One-year outcome of concurrent anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh surgery for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse: case series.
Lo TS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20547113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic sacral hysteropexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
Vitobello D; Siesto G; Bulletti C
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Mar; 8(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 22110011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
Rosenblum N
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of the modified Z trendelenburg position on intraocular pressure during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized, controlled study.
Raz O; Boesel TW; Arianayagam M; Lau H; Vass J; Huynh CC; Graham SL; Varol C
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1213-9. PubMed ID: 25444990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robotic transperitoneal infrarenal aortic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancy: a left lateral approach.
Jacob KA; Zanagnolo V; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 Oct; 21(8):733-6. PubMed ID: 21774694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robot-assisted pelvic urologic surgeries: is it feasible to perform under reduced tilt?
Aggarwal D; Bora GS; Mavuduru RS; Jangra K; Sharma AP; Gupta S; Devana SK; Parmar K; Kumar S; Mete UK; Singh SK
J Robot Surg; 2021 Aug; 15(4):553-559. PubMed ID: 32803652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.
Tomulescu V; Stănciulea O; Bălescu I; Vasile S; Tudor S; Gheorghe C; Vasilescu C; Popescu I
Chirurgia (Bucur); 2009; 104(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 19499656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomic and functional outcomes with the prolift procedure in elderly women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse who desire uterine preservation.
Cho MK; Kim CH; Kang WD; Kim JW; Kim SM; Kim YH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 22285676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
