These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22621993)

  • 61. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Advincula AP; Song A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Advances in urogynaecological robotic surgery.
    Swan K; Advincula AP
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):1024-7. PubMed ID: 21917106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Analysis of robotic performance times to improve operative efficiency.
    Geller EJ; Lin FC; Matthews CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 23141423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Robotic-assisted aortic surgery with and without minilaparotomy for complicated occlusive disease and aneurysm.
    Lin JC; Kaul SA; Bhandari A; Peterson EL; Peabody JO; Menon M
    J Vasc Surg; 2012 Jan; 55(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 21917403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Unpredicted neurological complications after robotic laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit formation in steep trendelenburg position: two case reports.
    Pandey R; Garg R; Darlong V; Punj J; Chandralekha ; Kumar A
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2010; 61(3):163-6. PubMed ID: 21268573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.
    Camanni M; Bonino L; Delpiano EM; Migliaretti G; Berchialla P; Deltetto F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 20619751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Adaptive support ventilation for gynaecological laparoscopic surgery in Trendelenburg position: bringing ICU modes of mechanical ventilation to the operating room.
    Lloréns J; Ballester M; Tusman G; Blasco L; García-Fernández J; Jover JL; Belda FJ
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Feb; 26(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19142087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report.
    Partin AW; Adams JB; Moore RG; Kavoussi LR
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Dec; 181(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 7582231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome.
    Ng KH; Lim YK; Ho KS; Ooi BS; Eu KW
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 19710972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Robotic/laparoscopic prolapse repair: role of hysteropexy: a urogynecology perspective.
    Ramm O; Kenton K
    Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 22877717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Haemodynamics and cardiac function during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep Trendelenburg position.
    Haas S; Haese A; Goetz AE; Kubitz JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):408-13. PubMed ID: 21815239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
    Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Women's preferences for minimally invasive incisions.
    Bush AJ; Morris SN; Millham FH; Isaacson KB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(5):640-3. PubMed ID: 21802378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
    Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
    ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A comparison of shoulder pressure among different patient stabilization techniques.
    Suozzi BA; Brazell HD; O'Sullivan DM; Tulikangas PK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):478.e1-5. PubMed ID: 23707805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; von Felten S; Schär G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 120(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 22914470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. [Robot-assisted laparoscopy in the management of recurrent pelvic cancer].
    Jauffret C; Lambaudie E; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Houvenaeghel G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2011 Dec; 39(12):674-80. PubMed ID: 21871833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.