These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22622205)
1. How closely do institutional review boards follow the common rule? Lidz CW; Appelbaum PS; Arnold R; Candilis P; Gardner W; Myers S; Simon L Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 22622205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trials and tribulations of navigating IRBs: anthropological and biomedical perspectives of "risk" in conducting human subjects research. Gordon EJ Anthropol Q; 2003; 76(2):299-320. PubMed ID: 15112685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional Review Board Quality, Private Equity, and Promoting Ethical Human Subjects Research. Lynch HF; Rosenfeld S Ann Intern Med; 2020 Oct; 173(7):558-562. PubMed ID: 32687743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Federal commissions and local IRBs. Yesley MS Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):11-2. PubMed ID: 6643032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards not sufficiently monitoring recruitment of human subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Aug; 15(8):1-3. PubMed ID: 12199290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform. Lidz CW; Garverich S J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(2):390-6. PubMed ID: 23802892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A qualitative study of institutional review board members' experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent. McClure KB; Delorio NM; Schmidt TA; Chiodo G; Gorman P J Med Ethics; 2007 May; 33(5):289-93. PubMed ID: 17470507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (Final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide. Ernst AA; Weiss SJ; Nick TG; Iserson K; Biros MH Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1134-7. PubMed ID: 16264084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Changing the paradigm: new directions in federal oversight of human research. Koski G J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2003; 37 Suppl 1():S2-6. PubMed ID: 14685070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Writing an application for a human subjects institutional review board. Colt HG; Mulnard RA Chest; 2006 Nov; 130(5):1605-7. PubMed ID: 17099043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human subject protections in the United States: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks. Russell-Einhorn M; Ellis GB J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12739540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Working with the institutional review board. Byerly WG Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2009 Jan; 66(2):176-84. PubMed ID: 19139484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A 12-year audit of IRB decisions. Grodin MA; Zaharoff BE; Kaminow PV QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1986 Mar; 12(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 3085041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]