These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22622205)
21. Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform. Gandhi R J Health Care Law Policy; 2005; 8(2):264-330. PubMed ID: 16471026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of institutional review boards on cancer research. Kennedy BJ J Bioeth; 1984; 5(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10271128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions. Ernst AA; Fish S Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 12(11):1050-5. PubMed ID: 16264073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Current status of the institutional review boards in Korea: constitution, operation, and policy for protection of human research participants. Kim OJ; Park BJ; Sohn DR; Lee SM; Shin SG J Korean Med Sci; 2003 Feb; 18(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 12589079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. What quality improvement professionals need to know about IRBs. Byers JF; Aragon ED J Healthc Qual; 2003; 25(4):4-9; quiz 9, 56. PubMed ID: 14606206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Research consent by adolescent minors and institutional review boards. Mammel KA; Kaplan DW J Adolesc Health; 1995 Nov; 17(5):323-30. PubMed ID: 8924437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Final Rule: When the Rubber Meets the Road. O'Rourke PP Am J Bioeth; 2017 Jul; 17(7):27-33. PubMed ID: 28661755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of the Nature of IRB Contingencies Required for Informed Consent Document Approval. Blackwood RA; Maio RF; Mrdjenovich AJ; VandenBosch TM; Gordon PS; Shipman EL; Hamilton TA Account Res; 2015; 22(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 25897768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A review of OHRP compliance oversight letters. Borror K; Carome M; McNeilly P; Weil C IRB; 2003; 25(5):1-4. PubMed ID: 14870724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework. Ross LF Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. New review burdens will affect many institutional review boards (IRBs). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):9. PubMed ID: 11933956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule. Sugarman J Am J Bioeth; 2017 Jul; 17(7):22-26. PubMed ID: 28661754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Bioethics in the Oversight of Clinical Research: Institutional Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards. Grady C Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2019; 29(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 31080176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council]. Shelton JD IRB; 1999; 21(6):6-9. PubMed ID: 11697393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]