404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22622208)
1. Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.
Kornfeld DS
Acad Med; 2012 Jul; 87(7):877-82. PubMed ID: 22622208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using criminalization and due process to reduce scientific misconduct.
Sovacool BK
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):W1-7. PubMed ID: 16179287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mentoring and research misconduct: an analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases.
Wright DE; Titus SL; Cornelison JB
Sci Eng Ethics; 2008 Sep; 14(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 18615274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality issues in clinical research and the implications on health policy (QICRHP).
Njie VP; Thomas AC
J Prof Nurs; 2001; 17(5):233-42. PubMed ID: 11559879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PHS perspectives on misconduct in science.
Brandt EN
Public Health Rep; 1983; 98(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 6856737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research misconduct, NSF v NIH: Its nature and prevalence and the impact of their respective methods of investigation and adjudication.
Kornfeld DS
Account Res; 2019 Aug; 26(6):369-378. PubMed ID: 31324124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions.
Resnik DB; Neal T; Raymond A; Kissling GE
Account Res; 2015; 22(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 25275621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the oversight of scientific misconduct.
Redman BK; Merz JF
Account Res; 2005; 12(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 16634167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ORI findings of scientific misconduct in clinical trials and publicly funded research, 1992-2002.
Reynolds SM
Clin Trials; 2004; 1(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 16279291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.
Scheetz MD
Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 10523125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Federal actions against plagiarism in research.
Price AR
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 11653389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific Misconduct.
Gross C
Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():693-711. PubMed ID: 26273897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scientific misconduct. How prevalent is fraud? That's a million-dollar question.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5497):1662-3. PubMed ID: 11186377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Innovation and integrity in biomedical research.
Jasanoff S
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S91-5. PubMed ID: 8396941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of culture in research misconduct.
Davis MS
Account Res; 2003; 10(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 14979320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the seriousness of research misconduct: considerations for sanction assignment.
Keranen L
Account Res; 2006; 13(2):179-205. PubMed ID: 16830407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research Misconduct Investigations in China's Science Funding System.
Tang L; Wang L; Hu G
Sci Eng Ethics; 2023 Nov; 29(6):39. PubMed ID: 37991609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sociology. Scientific misconduct: do the punishments fit the crime?
Redman BK; Merz JF
Science; 2008 Aug; 321(5890):775. PubMed ID: 18687942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should the government assure scientific integrity?
Klein DF
Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S56-9. PubMed ID: 8396939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
