These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22622208)

  • 41. Profits and plagiarism: the case of medical ghostwriting.
    Anekwe TD
    Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):267-72. PubMed ID: 19222448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Study proposed on integrity of published data.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Oct; 371(6500):733. PubMed ID: 7935825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Both accused researchers and whistle-blowers stay anonymous when no misconduct is found.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jul; 20(7):8. PubMed ID: 16270443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Scientific misconduct and findings against graduate and medical students.
    Parrish DM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2004 Jul; 10(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 15362705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Animal welfare and scientific misconduct: reviewing, investigating, and reporting violations and concerns.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2002 May; 31(5):17-8. PubMed ID: 11984546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
    McCrary SV; Anderson CB; Jakovljevic J; Khan T; McCullough LB; Wray NP; Brody BA
    N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(22):1621-6. PubMed ID: 11096171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Tie funding to research integrity.
    Titus S; Bosch X
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7305):436-7. PubMed ID: 20651673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Defining and Handling Research Misconduct: A Comparison Between Chinese and European Institutional Policies.
    Li D; Cornelis G
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2020 Oct; 15(4):302-319. PubMed ID: 32613889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research.
    Steinberg NA
    South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. So you suspect someone of fraud. What now?
    Powell K
    Nat Med; 2006 May; 12(5):492. PubMed ID: 16675983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ethical considerations in the interpretation and communication of clinical trial results.
    Coultas D
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2007 May; 4(2):194-8; discussion 198-9. PubMed ID: 17494731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Research Misconduct in Japan and How It Is Covered by the Media].
    Enoki E
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2018; 138(4):459-464. PubMed ID: 29607989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Scientific misconduct and medical research in Norway].
    Bekkelund SI; Hegstad AC; Førde OH
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1995 Oct; 115(25):3148-51. PubMed ID: 8539699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Whistle blowing and research integrity: Potential remedy for research misconduct in Malaysian institutions of higher education.
    Olesen AP; Amin L; Mahadi Z; Ibrahim M
    Account Res; 2019 Jan; 26(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 30489163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Scientific misconduct: also an issue in nursing science?
    Fierz K; Gennaro S; Dierickx K; Van Achterberg T; Morin KH; De Geest S
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Jul; 46(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24758524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Anonymous poison pen letters vs allegations of scientific misconduct.
    Price AR
    Acad Med; 1998 Oct; 73(10):1027-8. PubMed ID: 9795611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stop ignoring misconduct.
    Kornfeld DS; Titus SL
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7618):29-30. PubMed ID: 27582206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Scientific fraud: definitions, policies, and implications for nursing research.
    Chop RM; Silva MC
    J Prof Nurs; 1991; 7(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 2061524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.
    Pupovac V; Prijić-Samaržija S; Petrovečki M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Feb; 23(1):165-181. PubMed ID: 26940319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.