249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22622231)
1. Re-evaluating visual and auditory dominance through modality switching costs and congruency analyses.
Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jun; 140(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 22622231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The neural basis of visual dominance in the context of audio-visual object processing.
Schmid C; Büchel C; Rose M
Neuroimage; 2011 Mar; 55(1):304-11. PubMed ID: 21112404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study.
Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R
Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
Koppen C; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multisensory executive functioning.
Hunt AR; Kingstone A
Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 15177806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect.
Ngo MK; Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Aug; 480(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20561565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
Rodway P
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
Stephan DN; Koch I
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Existence of competing modality dominances.
Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of stimulus modality and frequency of stimulus presentation on cross-modal distraction.
Mayer AR; Franco AR; Canive J; Harrington DL
Cereb Cortex; 2009 May; 19(5):993-1007. PubMed ID: 18787235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active listening impairs visual perception and selectivity: an ERP study of auditory dual-task costs on visual attention.
Gherri E; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Apr; 23(4):832-44. PubMed ID: 20465407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
