BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22622664)

  • 21. [A prospective randomized controlled trial of pancreatic duct stent internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for the early curative effect after pancreaticoduodenectomy].
    Wang G; Sun B; Jiang H; Li L; Ma Y; Wu L; Liu J; Li P; Wu X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 May; 52(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 25034738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stenting and the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Moriya T; Clark CJ; Kirihara Y; Kendrick ML; Reid Lombardo KM; Que FG; Farnell MB
    Arch Surg; 2012 Jan; 147(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22250109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The impact of internal or external transanastomotic pancreatic duct stents following pancreaticojejunostomy. Which one is better? A meta-analysis.
    Zhou Y; Zhou Q; Li Z; Lin Q; Gong Y; Chen R
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Dec; 16(12):2322-35. PubMed ID: 23011201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomized multicentre trial comparing external and internal pancreatic stenting during pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Jang JY; Chang YR; Kim SW; Choi SH; Park SJ; Lee SE; Lim CS; Kang MJ; Lee H; Heo JS
    Br J Surg; 2016 May; 103(6):668-675. PubMed ID: 27040594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of a 7.5-Fr Pancreatic Stent for Preventing Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Iguchi T; Motomura T; Uchiyama H; Iseda N; Yoshida R; Kayashima H; Harada N; Ninomiya M; Sugimachi K; Honboh T; Maeda T; Sadanaga N; Matsuura H
    Dig Surg; 2021; 38(5-6):361-367. PubMed ID: 34784601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. External stent versus no stent for pancreaticojejunostomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Hong S; Wang H; Yang S; Yang K
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2013 Aug; 17(8):1516-25. PubMed ID: 23568149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Negative pressure external drainage of the pancreatic duct in pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Kim Z; Kim J; Min JK; Hur KY; Choi D; Seo D; Kim JH; Lee KJ; Nakao A
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2010; 57(99-100):625-30. PubMed ID: 20698239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical effect of pancreaticojejunostomy with a long-internal stent during pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with a main pancreatic duct of small diameter.
    Yamamoto T; Satoi S; Yanagimoto H; Hirooka S; Yamaki S; Ryota H; Kotsuka M; Matsui Y; Kon M
    Int J Surg; 2017 Jun; 42():158-163. PubMed ID: 28465259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Poon RT; Lo SH; Fong D; Fan ST; Wong J
    Am J Surg; 2002 Jan; 183(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 11869701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized clinical trial of external stent drainage of the pancreatic duct to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticojejunostomy.
    Motoi F; Egawa S; Rikiyama T; Katayose Y; Unno M
    Br J Surg; 2012 Apr; 99(4):524-31. PubMed ID: 22497024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
    Chen Z; Song X; Yang D; Li Y; Xu K; He Y
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):1177-85. PubMed ID: 25079195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of split pancreatic duct stent in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Tu J; Huang C; Xu W; Gong S; Cao Z; Wan P; Ying J; Rao X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Aug; 102(31):e34049. PubMed ID: 37543786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Liu QY; Zhang WZ; Xia HT; Leng JJ; Wan T; Liang B; Yang T; Dong JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(46):17491-7. PubMed ID: 25516663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The impact of pancreatic duct drainage following pancreaticojejunostomy on clinical outcome.
    Markar SR; Vyas S; Karthikesalingam A; Imber C; Malago M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Aug; 16(8):1610-7. PubMed ID: 22383216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pancreatic duct stents at pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis.
    Wang Q; He XR; Tian JH; Yang KH
    Dig Surg; 2013; 30(4-6):415-24. PubMed ID: 24217416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Internal pancreatic duct stent does not decrease pancreatic fistula rate after pancreatic resection: a meta-analysis.
    Zhou Y; Zhou Q; Li Z; Chen R
    Am J Surg; 2013 Jun; 205(6):718-25. PubMed ID: 23433889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Do transanastomotic pancreatic ductal stents after pancreatic resections improve outcomes?
    Shukla PJ; Barreto SG; Fingerhut A
    Pancreas; 2010 Jul; 39(5):561-6. PubMed ID: 20562577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Internal pancreatic ductal stenting to reduce leakage rate of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study.
    Lai EC; Chung NT; Yang GP; Li MK
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2011; 58(105):163-7. PubMed ID: 21510307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction for gastro/duodenojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Imamura M; Kimura Y; Ito T; Kyuno T; Nobuoka T; Mizuguchi T; Hirata K
    J Surg Res; 2016 Jan; 200(1):147-57. PubMed ID: 26344400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. External Versus Internal Pancreatic Duct Drainage for the Early Efficacy After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Retrospectively Comparative Study.
    Wang G; Li L; Ma Y; Qu FZ; Zhu H; Lv JC; Jia YH; Wu LF; Sun B
    J Invest Surg; 2016 Aug; 29(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 26822175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.