These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2262300)

  • 21. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mandibular first molar relation to variable lower face skeletal components.
    Andria LM; Leite LP; Dunlap AM; Cooper EC; King LB
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 17029555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dental arch shape and size in Malay schoolchildren with Class II malocclusion.
    Banabilh SM; Rajion ZA; Samsudin R; Singh GD
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 17203572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusions in transitional dentition.
    Kapoor S; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 12396087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Is the tongue position influenced by the palatal vault dimensions?
    Bourdiol P; Mishellany-Dutour A; Abou-El-Karam S; Nicolas E; Woda A
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 37(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 19925581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Variation in dentofacial morphology and occlusion in juvenile idiopathic arthritis subjects: a case-control study.
    Hu Y; Billiau AD; Verdonck A; Wouters C; Carels C
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 19164412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Sagittal dimensions and changes in cranio-facial structures due to growth in distoocclusion].
    Marić D
    Med Pregl; 1980; 33(11-12):453-6. PubMed ID: 7289981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maxillary and mandibular contribution to the establishment of class II malocclusion in an adult Lebanese population.
    El Hajj N; Bassil-Nassif N; Tauk A; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal JP
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):677-697. PubMed ID: 29113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Skeletal jaw relationships: a quantitative assessment using elliptical Fourier functions.
    Lowe BF; Phillips C; Lestrel PE; Fields HW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):299-308; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 7978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Do bivariate and multivariate cephalometric analyses lead to different results concerning the skeletal cause of postnormal occlusion?
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Gedrange T
    Funct Orthod; 2005; 22(2):6-8, 10, 12-3. PubMed ID: 16536177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle.
    Bhad WA; Nayak S; Doshi UH
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 21303811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The position of the occlusal plane in dentulous subjects with various skeletal jaw-relationships.
    Sinobad D
    J Oral Rehabil; 1988 Sep; 15(5):489-98. PubMed ID: 3244056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 2. On Angle Class II malocclusion (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T; Okada T; Ichikawa M; Kubota M; Iwasaki T
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 6935309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of dentoalveolar compensation in skeletal class II malocclusion in a Pakistani University Hospital setting.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Jan; 19(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19149973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.