These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2262300)
41. Class II Division II malocclusion does not influence upper airway length. Susarla SM; Abramson Z; Dodson TB; Kaban LB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1271. PubMed ID: 21501781 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Quantitative analysis of the maxilla and the mandible in hyper- and hypodivergent skeletal Class II pattern. Nair R; Deguchi TS; Li X; Katashiba S; Chan YH Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Feb; 12(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 19154269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Morphologic quantification of the maxilla and the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography. Deguchi T; Katashiba S; Inami T; Foong KW; Huak CY Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 20152678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns. Huang X; Hu X; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32066451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 1. On Angle Class I malocclusion (author's transl)]. Iwasawa T; Yamazaki T; Kawasaki H; Ohkawa S; Mimori M Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 6935308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Hyoid bone position and orientation in Class I and Class III malocclusions. Adamidis IP; Spyropoulos MN Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Apr; 101(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1558059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults. Fischer-Brandies H; Fischer-Brandies E; König A Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3860257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Dentoalveolar compensation related to variations in sagittal jaw relationships. Ishikawa H; Nakamura S; Iwasaki H; Kitazawa S; Tsukada H; Sato Y Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):534-8. PubMed ID: 10593444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles. Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A comparison of five different methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship. Kirchner J; Williams S Br J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 20(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8439526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The mandible in class II, division 2. Maj G; Lucchese FP Angle Orthod; 1982 Oct; 52(4):288-92. PubMed ID: 6961830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Chang HP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Aug; 92(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3475966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Morphological variation of Angle class II division 2 in Japanese male adults (author's transl)]. Deguchi T; Togari A; Matsui K; Ozawa M; Teramachi K; Matsuda Y Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Sep; 40(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 6947032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. [Measurement of maxillary and mandibular area on roentgenocephalograms. Comparisons between skeletal Class I, II and III (author's transl)]. Sakai T; Ito Y; Takeshita S; Yamada K Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Sep; 39(3):319-29. PubMed ID: 6935320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Variation in Class II malocclusion: comparison of Mexican mestizos and American whites. Phelan T; Buschang PH; Behrents RG; Wintergerst AM; Ceen RF; Hernandez A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 15067256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Use of the 'indicator line' to assess maxillary position. Mew J Funct Orthod; 1991; 8(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 1937156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Modeling facial movement: I. A dynamic analysis of differences based on skeletal characteristics. Trotman CA; Faraway JJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Nov; 62(11):1372-9. PubMed ID: 15510358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of facial morphology and sagittal relationship between dental arches in primary and mixed dentition. Traldi A; Valdrighi HC; de Souza LZ; Vedovello SA Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(4):63-7. PubMed ID: 26352847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cephalometric analysis: comparisons between maximum intercuspation and centric relation. Williamson EH; Caves SA; Edenfield RJ; Morse PK Am J Orthod; 1978 Dec; 74(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 281875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Characteristics of the Papua New Guinean dentition. II. Normal occlusion in an adolescent population. Doran GA Aust Dent J; 1978 Jun; 23(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 280309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]