107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2262375)
1. The effect of a dynamic wedge in the medial tangential field upon the contralateral breast dose.
McParland BJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Dec; 19(6):1515-20. PubMed ID: 2262375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the dose to the contralateral breast when using a dynamic wedge versus a regular wedge.
Weides CD; Mok EC; Chang WC; Findley DO; Shostak CA
Med Dosim; 1995; 20(4):287-93. PubMed ID: 8703326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose to the contralateral breast: a comparison of two techniques using the enhanced dynamic wedge versus a standard wedge.
Warlick WB; O'Rear JH; Earley L; Moeller JH; Gaffney DK; Leavitt DD
Med Dosim; 1997; 22(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 9307948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mobile shield to reduce scatter radiation to the contralateral breast during radiotherapy for breast cancer: preclinical results.
Sohn JW; Macklis R; Suh JH; Kupelian P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(5):1037-41. PubMed ID: 10192352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques.
Kelly CA; Wang XY; Chu JC; Hartsell WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 8621298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contralateral breast dose after whole-breast irradiation: an analysis by treatment technique.
Williams TM; Moran JM; Hsu SH; Marsh R; Yanke B; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2079-85. PubMed ID: 21489713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [An in-vivo dosimetric study of the scattered radiation during the treatment of breast carcinoma].
Portaluri M; Maiorana A; Corsa P; Fusco V; Lauriola P; Parisi S; Raguso A; Sanzo A; Giacco G
Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):122-5. PubMed ID: 8614713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scatter dose from tangential breast irradiation to the uninvolved breast.
Muller-Runkel R; Kalokhe UP
Radiology; 1990 Jun; 175(3):873-6. PubMed ID: 2343139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MEASUREMENT OF THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST PHOTON AND THERMAL NEUTRON DOSES IN BREAST CANCER RADIOTHERAPY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN PHYSICAL AND DYNAMIC WEDGES.
Bagheri H; Rabie Mahdavi S; Shekarchi B; Manouchehri F; Farhood B
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jan; 178(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 28591863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of a universal wedge and beam obliquity upon the central axis dose buildup for 6-MV x rays.
McParland BJ
Med Phys; 1991; 18(4):740-3. PubMed ID: 1921879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of contralateral breast doses from 1/2 beam block and isocentric treatment techniques for patients treated with primary breast irradiation with 60CO.
Tercilla O; Krasin F; Lawn-Tsao L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1989 Jul; 17(1):205-10. PubMed ID: 2745194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation.
Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16244787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison.
Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Factors affecting the contralateral dose for the non-treated breast in irradiation following quadrantectomy].
Stasi M; Moro G; Ramella S; Bertone A; Maruca S; Ciambellotti E
Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 9280945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Active minimisation of radiation scatter during breast radiotherapy: management implications for young patients with good-prognosis primary neoplasms.
Epstein RJ; Kelly SA; Cook M; Bateman A; Paddick I; Kam KC; Dunn P; Hanham IW; Dale RG; Price PM
Radiother Oncol; 1996 Jul; 40(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8844891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simple shielding reduces dose to the contralateral breast during prone breast cancer radiotherapy.
Goyal U; Locke A; Smith-Raymond L; Georgiev GN
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 26994826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of contralateral breast dose for various tangential field techniques in clinical radiotherapy.
Prabhakar R; Julka PK; Malik M; Ganesh T; Joshi RC; Sridhar PS; Rath GK; Pant GS; Thulkar S
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Apr; 6(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 17375976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved dose distribution with a universal acrylic breast compensator.
Johnson JM; Potish RA; Khan FM
Med Dosim; 1996; 21(3):127-32. PubMed ID: 8899675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy.
Burmeister J; Alvarado N; Way S; McDermott P; Bossenberger T; Jaenisch H; Patel R; Washington T
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 18262117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation.
Fraass BA; Roberson PL; Lichter AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Mar; 11(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 3972661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
