These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22624658)

  • 1. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
    Lantz B
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
    Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
    Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
    Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing two independent groups: a test based on a one-step M-estimator and bootstrap-t.
    Özdemir AF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):322-37. PubMed ID: 22708512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
    Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
    Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample t-test.
    Rochon J; Kieser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):410-26. PubMed ID: 21973094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size.
    Kim TK; Park JH
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 72(4):331-335. PubMed ID: 30929413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
    Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
    Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power.
    Blanca MJ; Arnau J; García-Castro FJ; Alarcón R; Bono R
    Psicothema; 2023 Feb; 35(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36695847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
    Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
    Springate SD
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.