232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22624658)
1. The impact of sample non-normality on ANOVA and alternative methods.
Lantz B
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):224-44. PubMed ID: 22624658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
Zimmerman DW
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing for a deficit in single-case studies: effects of departures from normality.
Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Azzalini A; Howell DC; Laws KR
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):666-77. PubMed ID: 16046228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
Guo JH; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary testing for normality: some statistical aspects of a common concept.
Schoder V; Himmelmann A; Wilhelm KP
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2006 Nov; 31(6):757-61. PubMed ID: 17040259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing two independent groups: a test based on a one-step M-estimator and bootstrap-t.
Özdemir AF
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):322-37. PubMed ID: 22708512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Power and Type I errors for pairwise comparisons of means in the unequal variances case.
Ramsey PH; Ramsey PP
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):263-81. PubMed ID: 18331666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample t-test.
Rochon J; Kieser M
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):410-26. PubMed ID: 21973094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
Koh A; Cribbie R
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size.
Kim TK; Park JH
Korean J Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 72(4):331-335. PubMed ID: 30929413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
Luh WM; Guo JH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Generalization of the Brown-Forsythe approach to factorial designs].
Vallejo Seco G; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):969-73. PubMed ID: 18940112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
Liu HY; Weng LJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-normal Data in Repeated Measures ANOVA: Impact on Type I Error and Power.
Blanca MJ; Arnau J; García-Castro FJ; Alarcón R; Bono R
Psicothema; 2023 Feb; 35(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36695847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal.
Guo JH; Luh WM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):417-25. PubMed ID: 18559139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Putative null distributions corresponding to tests of differential expression in the Golden Spike dataset are intensity dependent.
Gaile DP; Miecznikowski JC
BMC Genomics; 2007 Apr; 8():105. PubMed ID: 17445265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of sample size and bias on the reliability of estimates of error: a comparative study of Dahlberg's formula.
Springate SD
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21447784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
