These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22624759)

  • 1. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.
    Ongül D; Gökçen-Röhlig B; Şermet B; Keskin H
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Jun; 57(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 22624759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material.
    Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
    Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of splinting implant impression techniques: two dimensional analyses.
    Tarib NA; Seong TW; Chuen KM; Kun MS; Ahmad M; Kamarudin KH
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Mar; 20(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22474935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Cardoso A; Rocha EP; Gomes EA
    Implant Dent; 2008 Sep; 17(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 18784525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques.
    Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
    Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels.
    Martínez-Rus F; García C; Santamaría A; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Jun; 22(3):268-76. PubMed ID: 23615660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants.
    Cabral LM; Guedes CG
    Implant Dent; 2007 Jun; 16(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 17563509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models.
    Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prefabricated acrylic resin bars for splinting implant transfer copings.
    Dumbrigue HB; Gurun DC; Javid NS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):108-10. PubMed ID: 10898848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dimensional accuracy of pickup implant impression: an in vitro comparison of novel modular versus standard custom trays.
    Simeone P; Valentini PP; Pizzoferrato R; Scudieri F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):538-46. PubMed ID: 21691600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
    Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A technique to splint and verify the accuracy of implant impression copings with light-polymerizing acrylic resin.
    Rutkunas V; Ignatovic J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Mar; 111(3):254-6. PubMed ID: 24445030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.