These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals. Smith AF Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Harms M Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peering into the review process. Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The discourteous reviewer. Leviton A Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection? Enserink M Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Open access under scrutiny. Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster. Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload? Davis TR J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]