255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22624781)
1. JHS guidelines on systematic review and meta-analysis submissions.
Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 37(6):1121-4. PubMed ID: 22624781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
Phys Ther; 2009 Sep; 89(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 19723669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The PRISMA statement: a guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Swartz MK
J Pediatr Health Care; 2011; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21147401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting guidelines: CONSORT, PRISMA, and SQUIRE.
Foster RL
J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2012 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22188266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.
Smith AF
Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The EQUATOR Network and the PRISMA Statement for the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Harms M
Physiotherapy; 2009 Dec; 95(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 19892087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peering into the review process.
Nat Struct Biol; 2000 Dec; 7(12):1075-6. PubMed ID: 11101879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The discourteous reviewer.
Leviton A
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 21(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 17239173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
Enserink M
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1006-12. PubMed ID: 19631508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2535. PubMed ID: 19622551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Which scientific article is best qualified for publication?].
Barzilai M
Harefuah; 1997 Jul; 133(1-2):25-6. PubMed ID: 9332053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
PLoS Med; 2009 Jul; 6(7):e1000097. PubMed ID: 19621072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
Int J Surg; 2010; 8(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 20171303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
Moher D; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J; Altman DG;
Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(4):264-9, W64. PubMed ID: 19622511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assessment of observational studies is not commonplace in systematic reviews.
Mallen C; Peat G; Croft P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):765-9. PubMed ID: 16828667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. PRISMA.
Blegen MA
Nurs Res; 2010; 59(4):233. PubMed ID: 20585220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Open access under scrutiny.
Samkange-Zeeb F; Zeeb H
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):885-6. PubMed ID: 24285443
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
Sampson M; Shojania KG; Garritty C; Horsley T; Ocampo M; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial: an age of enlightenment or information overload?
Davis TR
J Hand Surg Br; 2004 Dec; 29(6):521-9. PubMed ID: 15542210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
