These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22624781)

  • 21. Systematic reviews: the case for rigorous methods and rigorous reporting.
    Cook D
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 9104514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)].
    Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2013 Sep; 184(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 23999778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Meta-analyses (QUOROM)].
    Urrutia G; Tort S; Bonfill X;
    Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Dec; 125 Suppl 1():32-7. PubMed ID: 16464425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Peer review and the fate of manuscripts.
    Frey JJ
    Fam Med; 1985; 17(1):3. PubMed ID: 3843084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The evidence base of taming continuously proliferating evidence.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1241-2. PubMed ID: 23083676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New committee to oversee relationship between CMA, CMAJ.
    Sullivan P
    CMAJ; 2003 Feb; 168(3):332. PubMed ID: 12566356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and The Lancet.
    Jefferson T; Smith R; Yee Y; Drummond M; Pratt M; Gale R
    JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 9676680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting.
    McInnes M; Tunis AS
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):303-4. PubMed ID: 24956054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perfecting peer review?
    Nat Med; 2011 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21217648
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CONSORT and QUOROM guidelines for reporting randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews.
    Turpin DL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):681-5; discussion 686. PubMed ID: 16360902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maximizing the quality of review articles.
    Sladden MJ; Sladden CS
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 157(2):409. PubMed ID: 17573872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].
    Antes G; von Elm E
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2009 Aug; 134(33):1619. PubMed ID: 19650021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD; Travers A; Dorgan M; Slater L; Rowe BH
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: original data versus systematic reviews in the medical literature.
    Bolland MJ; Grey A; Reid IR
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1265):U2804. PubMed ID: 18264184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Evaluating the methodologic quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews].
    Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2013 Oct; 185(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 24490255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomised controlled trial to meta-analysis ratio: a reply from a group producing systematic reviews.
    Weir R; Bidwell S
    N Z Med J; 2007 Nov; 120(1266):U2843. PubMed ID: 18264210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Veterinary pathology and peer review.
    Cantor GH; Caswell JL; Crissman JW; Gillette DM; Gunson DE; Hogenesch H; Kiupel M; Mense MG; Miller MA; Rush LJ; Leger JA; Schoeb TR; Sellers RS; Sills RC; Swayne DE; Thomas HC; Ward JM; Alden CL
    Vet Pathol; 2009 Mar; 46(2):173-5. PubMed ID: 19261628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.