678 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22624898)
1. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome.
Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.
Zhou J; Gu W; Li S; Wu L; Gao Y; Guo X
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creation.
Ortiz D; Alió JL; Piñero D
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Feb; 34(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 18242446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser.
Hamilton DR; Johnson RD; Lee N; Bourla N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Dec; 34(12):2049-56. PubMed ID: 19027558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transitioning from mechanical microkeratome to femtosecond laser flap creation: visual outcomes of an experienced and a novice LASIK surgeon.
Reinstein DZ; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1788-95. PubMed ID: 22999602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study.
Durrie DS; Kezirian GM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 15721704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictors of Myopic Regression for Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis Flap Creation with Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser in Low and Moderate Myopia.
Zhou J; Gao Y; Li S; Gu W; Wu L; Guo X
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 31878825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Single versus double femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flap in contralateral eyes: visual and optical outcomes.
Muñoz G; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Javaloy J; García-Lázaro S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 22153090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dry eyes and corneal sensation after laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond laser flap creation Effect of hinge position, hinge angle, and flap thickness.
Mian SI; Li AY; Dutta S; Musch DC; Shtein RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2092-8. PubMed ID: 19969213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia.
Montés-Micó R; Rodríguez-Galietero A; Alió JL
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 17070593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of visual results between laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Teus MA; de Benito-Llopis L; García-González M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 146(3):357-362. PubMed ID: 18614136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome for LASIK: a randomized controlled study.
Patel SV; Maguire LJ; McLaren JW; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
Ophthalmology; 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90. PubMed ID: 17350688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety, efficacy, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis to correct myopia or myopic astigmatism with a 750 Hz scanning-spot laser system.
Tomita M; Watabe M; Yukawa S; Nakamura N; Nakamura T; Magnago T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 24345530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome.
Wang Y; Li J; Liu Y; Xie L
J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 23909780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome flap creation.
Antonios R; Arba Mosquera S; Awwad ST
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1602-9. PubMed ID: 26432116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using a 200 kHz femtosecond laser.
Cummings AB; Cummings BK; Kelly GE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 23352500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective contralateral eye study to compare 80- and 120-μm flap LASIK using the VisuMax femtosecond laser.
Lim DH; Keum JE; Ju WK; Lee JH; Chung TY; Chung ES
J Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 29(7):462-8. PubMed ID: 23820228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy, safety, and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Vryghem JC; Devogelaere T; Stodulka P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Mar; 36(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 20202543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual outcomes comparison of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis.
Ang M; Mehta JS; Rosman M; Li L; Koh JC; Htoon HM; Tan D; Chan C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1647-52. PubMed ID: 24054977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
