301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22628588)
1. High incidence of pseudotumour formation after large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study.
Bosker BH; Ettema HB; Boomsma MF; Kollen BJ; Maas M; Verheyen CC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):755-61. PubMed ID: 22628588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Similar incidence of periprosthetic fluid collections after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasties and metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasties: results of a screening metal artefact reduction sequence-MRI study.
Bisseling P; de Wit BW; Hol AM; van Gorp MJ; van Kampen A; van Susante JL
Bone Joint J; 2015 Sep; 97-B(9):1175-82. PubMed ID: 26330582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pseudotumour incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-on-metal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: mid-term results of a randomised controlled trial.
van der Veen HC; Reininga IH; Zijlstra WP; Boomsma MF; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Nov; 97-B(11):1481-7. PubMed ID: 26530649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Asymptomatic pseudotumours after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing show little change within one year.
van der Weegen W; Brakel K; Horn RJ; Hoekstra HJ; Sijbesma T; Pilot P; Nelissen RG
Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1626-31. PubMed ID: 24293591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adverse reaction to metal debris in a consecutive series of DUROM™ hip resurfacing: pseudotumour incidence and metal ion concentration.
Hartmann A; Kieback JD; Lützner J; Günther KP; Goronzy J
Hip Int; 2017 Jul; 27(4):343-348. PubMed ID: 28218371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.
Grammatopoulos G; Pandit H; ; Murray DW; Gill HS
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Nov; 92(11):1527-34. PubMed ID: 21037347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High incidence of pseudotumours after hip resurfacing even in low risk patients; results from an intensified MRI screening protocol.
van der Weegen W; Smolders JM; Sijbesma T; Hoekstra HJ; Brakel K; van Susante JL
Hip Int; 2013; 23(3):243-9. PubMed ID: 23233174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pseudotumor in large-diameter metal-on-metal total hip articulation.
Shahrdar C
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):665.e21-3. PubMed ID: 20663635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours.
Kwon YM; Glyn-Jones S; Simpson DJ; Kamali A; McLardy-Smith P; Gill HS; Murray DW
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 20190305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the effect of large and small metal-on-metal bearings in total hip arthroplasty on metal ion levels and the incidence of pseudotumour: a five-year follow-up of a previous report.
Ando W; Yasui H; Yamamoto K; Oinuma K; Tokunaga H; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Aihara M; Nakanishi R; Ohzono K
Bone Joint J; 2018 Aug; 100-B(8):1018-1024. PubMed ID: 30062951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 5-year survival analysis of 160 Biomet Magnum M2 metal-on-metal total hip prostheses.
Koper MC; Mathijssen NM; Vehmeijer SB
Hip Int; 2016; 26(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 26541184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.
Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence and natural course of pseudotumours after small-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18-year follow-up study of a previous report.
Moon JK; Kim Y; Hwang KT; Yang JH; Ryu JA; Kim YH
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):317-324. PubMed ID: 30813798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Corrosion at the neck-stem junction as a cause of metal ion release and pseudotumour formation.
Gill IP; Webb J; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jul; 94(7):895-900. PubMed ID: 22733942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation.
Liow MHL; Kwon YM
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):885-892. PubMed ID: 27761629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing based on magnetic resonance imaging, metal ion levels and symptoms.
van der Weegen W; Sijbesma T; Hoekstra HJ; Brakel K; Pilot P; Nelissen RG
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):416-21. PubMed ID: 23871706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High rate of revision and a high incidence of radiolucent lines around Metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacements: results from a randomised controlled trial of three bearings after seven years.
Bjorgul K; Novicoff WN; Andersen ST; Ahlund OR; Bunes A; Wiig M; Brevig K
Bone Joint J; 2013 Jul; 95-B(7):881-6. PubMed ID: 23814237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral total hip replacement: periprosthetic pseudotumor collections are more prevalent in metal-on-metal implants compared to non-metal-on-metal ones.
Slonimsky E; Kushnir T; Kadar A; Menahem A; Grundshtein A; Dekel S; Eshed I
Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 25940064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pseudotumours, cobalt and clinical outcome in small head metal-on-metal versus conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty.
van der Veen HC; Reininga IH; Zijlstra WP; Boomsma MF; Bulstra SK; van Raay JJ
Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 30838896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective, randomised controlled trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip replacement.
Schouten R; Malone AA; Tiffen C; Frampton CM; Hooper G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Nov; 94(11):1462-7. PubMed ID: 23109623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
