These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22629366)
1. Left inferior frontal activations depending on the canonicity determined by the argument structures of ditransitive sentences: an MEG study. Inubushi T; Iijima K; Koizumi M; Sakai KL PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37192. PubMed ID: 22629366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural correlates of morphosyntactic and verb-argument structure processing: an EfMRI study. Raettig T; Frisch S; Friederici AD; Kotz SA Cortex; 2010 May; 46(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 19664766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cortical dynamics in building syntactic structures of sentences: an MEG study in a minimal-pair paradigm. Iijima K; Fukui N; Sakai KL Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1387-96. PubMed ID: 19041723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Representation of the verb's argument-structure in the human brain. Assadollahi R; Rockstroh BS BMC Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 9():69. PubMed ID: 18644141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study. Krause CD; Fengler A; Pino D; Sehm B; Friederici AD; Obrig H Neuropsychologia; 2023 Feb; 180():108465. PubMed ID: 36586718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural basis of syntactic processing of simple sentences in Japanese. Ogawa K; Ohba M; Inui T Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1437-41. PubMed ID: 17712270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How the brain processes different dimensions of argument structure complexity: evidence from fMRI. Meltzer-Asscher A; Mack JE; Barbieri E; Thompson CK Brain Lang; 2015 Mar; 142():65-75. PubMed ID: 25658635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An fMRI study of canonical and noncanonical word order in German. Bahlmann J; Rodriguez-Fornells A; Rotte M; Münte TF Hum Brain Mapp; 2007 Oct; 28(10):940-9. PubMed ID: 17274018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subliminal enhancement of predictive effects during syntactic processing in the left inferior frontal gyrus: an MEG study. Iijima K; Sakai KL Front Syst Neurosci; 2014; 8():217. PubMed ID: 25404899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory. Fiebach CJ; Schlesewsky M; Lohmann G; von Cramon DY; Friederici AD Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Feb; 24(2):79-91. PubMed ID: 15455462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of the IFG and pSTS in syntactic prediction: Evidence from a parametric study of hierarchical structure in fMRI. Matchin W; Hammerly C; Lau E Cortex; 2017 Mar; 88():106-123. PubMed ID: 28088041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions. Kohen F; Milsark G; Martin N Aphasiology; 2011; 25(6-7):736-747. PubMed ID: 28133406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy during sentence comprehension: an ERP study. Zhou X; Jiang X; Ye Z; Zhang Y; Lou K; Zhan W Neuropsychologia; 2010 May; 48(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 20138898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neural correlates of noncanonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture-sentence matching task. Kinno R; Kawamura M; Shioda S; Sakai KL Hum Brain Mapp; 2008 Sep; 29(9):1015-27. PubMed ID: 17924553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Friederici AD; Rüschemeyer SA; Hahne A; Fiebach CJ Cereb Cortex; 2003 Feb; 13(2):170-7. PubMed ID: 12507948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetoencephalography Reveals Mismatch Field Enhancement from Unexpected Syntactic Category Errors in English Sentences. Kubota M; Ono Y; Ishiyama A; Zouridakis G; Papanicolaou AC Neurosci Lett; 2018 Jan; 662():195-204. PubMed ID: 28847487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of verb and sentence processing deficits in stroke-induced aphasia: the Italian version of the Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS-I). Barbieri E; Alessio V; Zanobio E; Scola I; Luzzatti C; Thompson CK Aphasiology; 2024; 38(3):510-543. PubMed ID: 38694546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MEG study on neural activities associated with syntactic and semantic violations in spoken Korean sentences. Kwon H; Kuriki S; Kim JM; Lee YH; Kim K; Nam K Neurosci Res; 2005 Apr; 51(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15740798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An fMRI study of syntactic layers: sentential and lexical aspects of embedding. Shetreet E; Friedmann N; Hadar U Neuroimage; 2009 Dec; 48(4):707-16. PubMed ID: 19595775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]