These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22630784)

  • 1. Magnitude and accuracy differences between judgements of remembering and forgetting.
    Serra MJ; England BD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2231-57. PubMed ID: 22630784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Framing affects scale usage for judgments of learning, not confidence in memory.
    England BD; Ortegren FR; Serra MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1898-1908. PubMed ID: 28504530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs).
    Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1376-96. PubMed ID: 22524495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metamemory adjustments over time in adults with and without traumatic brain injury.
    Krause M; Kennedy MR
    Brain Inj; 2009 Nov; 23(12):965-72. PubMed ID: 19831493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracing the path of forgetting in rule abstraction and exemplar retrieval.
    Hoffmann JA; von Helversen B; Weilbächer RA; Rieskamp J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Nov; 71(11):2261-2281. PubMed ID: 30362409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.
    Weaver CA; Kelemen WL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1058-65. PubMed ID: 14622046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
    Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
    Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recollection-based prospective metamemory judgments are more accurate than those based on confidence: judgments of remembering and knowing (JORKS).
    McCabe DP; Soderstrom NC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):605-21. PubMed ID: 21707208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inhibitory deficits in older adults: list-method directed forgetting revisited.
    Zellner M; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):290-300. PubMed ID: 16569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect.
    Geraci L; Manzano I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.
    Hu X; Liu Z; Li T; Luo L
    Memory; 2016; 24(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 25686085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20053044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The sensitivity of judgment-of-learning resolution to past test performance, new learning, and forgetting.
    Ariel R; Dunlosky J
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jan; 39(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 21264621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metacognition influences item-method directed forgetting.
    Foster NL; Sahakyan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1309-24. PubMed ID: 22468801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention.
    Sundqvist ML; Todorov I; Kubik V; Jönsson FU
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Dec; 53(6):450-4. PubMed ID: 22897518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do older adults show less confidence in their monitoring of learning?
    Serra MJ; Dunlosky J; Hertzog C
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):379-91. PubMed ID: 18726751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experience-based and theory-based processes.
    Koriat A; Bjork RA; Sheffer L; Bar SK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Dec; 133(4):643-56. PubMed ID: 15584811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.