These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22632277)

  • 1. Awarding global grades in OSCEs: evaluation of a novel eLearning resource for OSCE examiners.
    Gormley GJ; Johnston J; Thomson C; McGlade K
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(7):587-9. PubMed ID: 22632277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
    Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter-examiner agreement in clinical evaluation.
    Reubenson A; Schnepf T; Waller R; Edmondston S
    Clin Teach; 2012 Apr; 9(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 22405367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standardized examinees: development of a new tool to evaluate factors influencing OSCE scores and to train examiners.
    Zimmermann P; Kadmon M
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc40. PubMed ID: 32685668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of patient communication skills during OSCE: examining effectiveness of a training program in minimizing inter-grader variability.
    Schwartzman E; Hsu DI; Law AV; Chung EP
    Patient Educ Couns; 2011 Jun; 83(3):472-7. PubMed ID: 21555198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Developing a video-based method to compare and adjust examiner effects in fully nested OSCEs.
    Yeates P; Cope N; Hawarden A; Bradshaw H; McCray G; Homer M
    Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 53(3):250-263. PubMed ID: 30575092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examiners are most lenient at the start of a two-day OSCE.
    Hope D; Cameron H
    Med Teach; 2015 Jan; 37(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 25154400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can student tutors act as examiners in an objective structured clinical examination?
    Chenot JF; Simmenroth-Nayda A; Koch A; Fischer T; Scherer M; Emmert B; Stanske B; Kochen MM; Himmel W
    Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 41(11):1032-8. PubMed ID: 17973763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs.
    Harasym PH; Woloschuk W; Cunning L
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):617-32. PubMed ID: 17610034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Senior medical students as peer examiners in an OSCE.
    Burgess A; Clark T; Chapman R; Mellis C
    Med Teach; 2013; 35(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 23102164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of first-year veterinary students' clinical skills using objective structured clinical examinations.
    Hecker K; Read EK; Vallevand A; Krebs G; Donszelmann D; Muelling CK; Freeman SL
    J Vet Med Educ; 2010; 37(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 21135408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of examiner type on dental students' OSCE scores.
    Park SE; Kim A; Kristiansen J; Karimbux NY
    J Dent Educ; 2015 Jan; 79(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25576557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
    Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Twelve tips for designing and implementing a structured rater training in OSCEs.
    Preusche I; Schmidts M; Wagner-Menghin M
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(5):368-72. PubMed ID: 22452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training OSCE examiners: minimal effort with far-reaching results.
    Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Nühse K; Strohmer R; Kaden JJ
    Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 53(11):1153-1154. PubMed ID: 31583759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progress testing: is there a role for the OSCE?
    Pugh D; Touchie C; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
    Med Educ; 2014 Jun; 48(6):623-31. PubMed ID: 24807438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive validity of a tool to resolve borderline grades in OSCEs.
    Klein Nulend R; Harris P; Shulruf B
    GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(3):Doc31. PubMed ID: 32566733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a more nuanced conceptualisation of differential examiner stringency in OSCEs.
    Homer M
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):919-934. PubMed ID: 37843678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of candidate familiarity on examiner OSCE scores.
    Jefferies A; Simmons B; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 17727529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of a new e-learning resource for calibrating OSCE examiners on the use of rating scales.
    Moreno-López R; Sinclair S
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 May; 24(2):276-281. PubMed ID: 31925850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.