122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22632666)
1. Physician documentation deficiencies in abdominal ultrasound reports: frequency, characteristics, and financial impact.
Duszak R; Nossal M; Schofield L; Picus D
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jun; 9(6):403-8. PubMed ID: 22632666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementation and evaluation of a performance improvement intervention to address physician documentation deficiencies in abdominal ultrasound.
Patil VV; Delman BN; Wilck EJ; Simpson WL
Ultrasound Q; 2014 Jun; 30(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 24850025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Financial impact of emergency department ultrasound.
Soremekun OA; Noble VE; Liteplo AS; Brown DF; Zane RD
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jul; 16(7):674-80. PubMed ID: 19549014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardized cine-loop documentation in abdominal ultrasound facilitates offline image interpretation.
Dormagen JB; Gaarder M; Drolsum A
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 24345769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Point-of-Care Ultrasound Work Flow Innovation: Impact on Documentation and Billing.
Flannigan MJ; Adhikari S
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Dec; 36(12):2467-2474. PubMed ID: 28646595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CPT coding by interventional radiologists: a multi-institutional evaluation of accuracy and its economic implications.
Duszak R; Blackham WC; Kusiak GM; Majchrzak J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):734-40. PubMed ID: 17411693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Documentation, coding, and billing: what abdominal radiologists need to know.
Rosenkrantz AB; Degnan AJ; Duszak R
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Mar; 43(3):734-741. PubMed ID: 28664361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A diagnostic expert system for structured reports, quality assessment, and training of residents in sonography.
Huettig M; Buscher G; Menzel T; Scheppach W; Puppe F; Buscher HP
Med Klin (Munich); 2004 Mar; 99(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 15024483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Level of billing as a function of resident documentation and orthopedic subspecialty at an academic multispecialty orthopedic surgery practice.
Dezfuli B; Smith JL
Orthopedics; 2012 Nov; 35(11):e1655-8. PubMed ID: 23127460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic errors in orthopedic surgery: evaluation of resident documentation of neurovascular examinations for orthopedic trauma patients.
Tan EW; Ting BL; Jia X; Skolasky RL; McFarland EG
Am J Med Qual; 2013; 28(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 22798636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased error rates in preliminary reports issued by radiology residents working more than 10 consecutive hours overnight.
Ruutiainen AT; Durand DJ; Scanlon MH; Itri JN
Acad Radiol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23452475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians.
Levin DC; Rao VM; Parker L; Frangos AJ; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):744-7. PubMed ID: 18514954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician and patient characteristics affecting repeat use of abdominal ultrasound: A nationwide population-based study.
Chu D; Chen RC; Hung ST; Chou P
J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Feb; 77(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 24308909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Traditional text-only versus multimedia-enhanced radiology reporting: referring physicians' perceptions of value.
Sadigh G; Hertweck T; Kao C; Wood P; Hughes D; Henry TS; Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 May; 12(5):519-24. PubMed ID: 25622764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of hospital complications and costs associated with using ultrasound guidance during abdominal paracentesis procedures.
Patel PA; Ernst FR; Gunnarsson CL
J Med Econ; 2012; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22011070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective, blinded evaluation of accuracy of operative reports dictated by surgical residents.
Novitsky YW; Sing RF; Kercher KW; Griffo ML; Matthews BD; Heniford BT
Am Surg; 2005 Aug; 71(8):627-31; discussion 631-2. PubMed ID: 16217943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Obstetric Ultrasound Efficiency and Accuracy Using a Protocol-Based Examination.
Ruma MS; Bradley H; Holstrom A; Rigdon J; Herring A
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Mar; 35(3):565-9. PubMed ID: 26892820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [What's the price of routine sonography--results of an analysis of costs and processes in a district hospital].
Nürnberg D; Jung A; Schmieder C; Schmidt M; Holle A
Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):405-17. PubMed ID: 18491257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PET and PET/CT reports: observations from the National Oncologic PET Registry.
Coleman RE; Hillner BE; Shields AF; Duan F; Merlino DA; Hanna LG; Stine SH; Siegel BA
J Nucl Med; 2010 Jan; 51(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 20008997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
