122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22632666)
21. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Pictocam instead of Pictogram - a quality improvement study in abdominal ultrasound imaging].
Fröhlich E; Hofmann J; Debove I; Dietrich CF; Kaarmann H; Pauluschke-Fröhlich J; Schmidt S; Muller R
Z Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 26(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 26900096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.
Cavagna E; Berletti R; Schiavon F; Scarsi B; Barbato G
Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Case for active physician involvement in US practice.
Chan V; Hanbidge A; Wilson S; Pron G; Moore L
Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):555-60. PubMed ID: 8668811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting.
Gunn AJ; Alabre CI; Bennett SE; Kautzky M; Krakower T; Palamara K; Choy G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 24059375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A workflow task force affects emergency physician compliance for point-of-care ultrasound documentation and billing.
Lewiss RE; Cook J; Sauler A; Avitabile N; Kaban NL; Rabrich J; Saul T; Siadecki SD; Wiener D
Crit Ultrasound J; 2016 Dec; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 27207087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey.
Powell DK; Silberzweig JE
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 25442793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Community-based obstetrical ultrasound reports: documentation of compliance with suggested minimum standards.
Smulian JC; Vintzileos AM; Rodis JF; Campbell WA
J Clin Ultrasound; 1996; 24(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 8838300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Recent trends in utilization of vascular ultrasound among radiologists, surgeons, cardiologists, and other physicians.
Levin DC; Rao VM; Frangos AJ; Parker L; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Feb; 4(2):125-7. PubMed ID: 17412244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ultrasound of the acute abdomen performed by surgeons in training.
Eiberg JP; Grantcharov TP; Eriksen JR; Boel T; Buhl C; Jensen D; Pedersen JF; Schulze S
Minerva Chir; 2008 Feb; 63(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 18212723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Time requirements of medical and non-medical personnel for ultrasound studies].
Reuss J; Weiss H; Wanner T; Leser HG
Ultraschall Med; 1998 Jun; 19(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 9744044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Prospective observation of abdominal ultrasound in radiological emergency services: approaches to cost saving].
Heindel W; Datené S; Lauterbach K; Gandjour A
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1207-13. PubMed ID: 12964075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The devil is in the details: maximizing revenue for daily trauma care.
Barnes SL; Robinson BR; Richards JT; Zimmerman CE; Pritts TA; Tsuei BJ; Butler KL; Muskat PC; Davis K; Johannigman JA
Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):670-5; discussion 675-6. PubMed ID: 18847653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Addenda to the radiology report: what are we trying to convey?
Hussain S; Allende MB; Karam AR; Hussain JS; Vijayaraghavan G
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 Oct; 8(10):703-5. PubMed ID: 21962784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Family physicians' opinions on the primary care documentation, coding, and billing system: a qualitative study from the residency research network of Texas.
Young RA; Bayles B; Hill JH; Kumar KA
Fam Med; 2014 May; 46(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 24915481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Errors in abdominal ultrasonography in dogs and cats.
Garcia DA; Froes TR
J Small Anim Pract; 2012 Sep; 53(9):514-9. PubMed ID: 22788769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Computer based documentation of ultrasound data].
Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T; Zimmermann R
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2004 Mar; 93(13):509-14. PubMed ID: 15083908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Blunt abdominal trauma: clinical value of negative screening US scans.
Sirlin CB; Brown MA; Andrade-Barreto OA; Deutsch R; Fortlage DA; Hoyt DB; Casola G
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):661-8. PubMed ID: 14990832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparative increases in utilization rates of ultrasound examinations among radiologists, cardiologists, and other physicians from 1993 to 2001.
Levin DC; Rao VM; Maitino AJ; Parker L; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Aug; 1(8):549-52. PubMed ID: 17411652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double-blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer.
Leslie A; Lockyer H; Virjee JP
Clin Radiol; 2000 Aug; 55(8):606-9. PubMed ID: 10964731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
