255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22632692)
1. Minimally invasive versus conventional joint arthroplasty.
Kenney NA; Farmer KW
PM R; 2012 May; 4(5 Suppl):S134-40. PubMed ID: 22632692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total joint arthroplasty for persons with osteoarthritis.
Grayson CW; Decker RC
PM R; 2012 May; 4(5 Suppl):S97-103. PubMed ID: 22632709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Excellent results of surgical management of osteoarthritis. Arthroplasty and osteotomy provide pain relief and restore joint function].
Ryd L
Lakartidningen; 2002 Nov; 99(46):4651-5. PubMed ID: 12486971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive total hip and knee arthroplasty-implications for the elderly patient.
Reininga IH; Stevens M; Wagenmakers R; Bulstra SK; van den Akker-Scheek I
Clin Geriatr Med; 2012 Aug; 28(3):447-58. PubMed ID: 22840307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hip and knee arthroplasty in the geriatric population.
St Clair SF; Higuera C; Krebs V; Tadross NA; Dumpe J; Barsoum WK
Clin Geriatr Med; 2006 Aug; 22(3):515-33. PubMed ID: 16860243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic health databases for epidemiological research on joint replacements: considerations when making cross-national comparisons.
Oleske DM; Bonafede MM; Jick S; Ji M; Hall JA
Ann Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 24(9):660-5. PubMed ID: 25088754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes.
Hamel MB; Toth M; Legedza A; Rosen MP
Arch Intern Med; 2008 Jul; 168(13):1430-40. PubMed ID: 18625924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shoulder arthroplasty versus hip and knee arthroplasties: a comparison of outcomes.
Farmer KW; Hammond JW; Queale WS; Keyurapan E; McFarland EG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():183-9. PubMed ID: 16980898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.
Richmond JC
Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2008 Aug; 34(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 18687285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different surgical options for monocompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee: high tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty: indications, techniques, results, and controversies.
Mont MA; Stuchin SA; Paley D; Sharkey PF; Parvisi J; Tria AJ; Bonutti PM; Etienne G
Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():265-83. PubMed ID: 15116621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical approaches for osteoarthritis.
Günther KP
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2001 Oct; 15(4):627-43. PubMed ID: 11567544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postoperative improvement in health-related quality of life: a national comparison of surgical treatment for focal (one- to two-level) lumbar spinal stenosis compared with total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.
Rampersaud YR; Wai EK; Fisher CG; Yee AJ; Dvorak MF; Finkelstein JA; Gandhi R; Abraham EP; Lewis SJ; Alexander DI; Oxner WM; Davey JR; Mahomed N
Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):1033-41. PubMed ID: 22122836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative analysis of patient-centered outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty].
Wollmerstedt N; Glatzel M; Kirschner S; Schneider J; Faller H; König A
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(5):464-71. PubMed ID: 16991061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Total knee arthroplasty: the future.
Pandit H; Aslam N; Pirpiris M; Jinnah R
J Surg Orthop Adv; 2006; 15(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 16919198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The anterolateral minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty: technique, pitfalls, and way out.
Basad E; Ishaque B; Stürz H; Jerosch J
Orthop Clin North Am; 2009 Oct; 40(4):473-8, viii. PubMed ID: 19773052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Minimally Invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicondylar knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: a 5-year follow-up].
Endres S; Steinheiser E; Wilke A
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2005; 143(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 16224679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical management of osteoarthritis.
Di Cesare PE
Clin Geriatr Med; 1998 Aug; 14(3):613-31. PubMed ID: 9664109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. OMERACT/OARSI initiative to define states of severity and indication for joint replacement in hip and knee osteoarthritis.
Gossec L; Hawker G; Davis AM; Maillefert JF; Lohmander LS; Altman R; Cibere J; Conaghan PG; Hochberg MC; Jordan JM; Katz JN; March L; Mahomed N; Pavelka K; Roos EM; Suarez-Almazor ME; Zanoli G; Dougados M
J Rheumatol; 2007 Jun; 34(6):1432-5. PubMed ID: 17552070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications.
Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP
Orthop Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 35(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 15062705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
