These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22633004)

  • 1. Sounds exaggerate visual shape.
    Sweeny TD; Guzman-Martinez E; Ortega L; Grabowecky M; Suzuki S
    Cognition; 2012 Aug; 124(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 22633004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Timing in audiovisual speech perception: A mini review and new psychophysical data.
    Venezia JH; Thurman SM; Matchin W; George SE; Hickok G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Feb; 78(2):583-601. PubMed ID: 26669309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mouth and Voice: A Relationship between Visual and Auditory Preference in the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus.
    Zhu LL; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(10):2697-2708. PubMed ID: 28179553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speaker identity supports phonetic category learning.
    Mani N; Schneider S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 23148468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deviant processing of letters and speech sounds as proximate cause of reading failure: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of dyslexic children.
    Blau V; Reithler J; van Atteveldt N; Seitz J; Gerretsen P; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Brain; 2010 Mar; 133(Pt 3):868-79. PubMed ID: 20061325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sound location can influence audiovisual speech perception when spatial attention is manipulated.
    Tiippana K; Puharinen H; Möttönen R; Sams M
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(1):67-90. PubMed ID: 21406157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptation to different mouth shapes influences visual perception of ambiguous lip speech.
    Jones BC; Feinberg DR; Bestelmeyer PE; Debruine LM; Little AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Aug; 17(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 20702872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between auditory-visual speech perception and language-specific speech perception at the onset of reading instruction in English-speaking children.
    Erdener D; Burnham D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):120-38. PubMed ID: 23773915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Investigation of Sound-Symbolism in the Context of Tactile Feeling.
    Lo LY; Luk HM; Thompson N
    J Gen Psychol; 2017; 144(2):157-167. PubMed ID: 28362232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for a specific cross-modal association deficit in dyslexia: an electrophysiological study of letter-speech sound processing.
    Froyen D; Willems G; Blomert L
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jul; 14(4):635-48. PubMed ID: 21676085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term adaptation to sound statistics is unimpaired in developmental dyslexia.
    Gabay Y; Holt LL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198146. PubMed ID: 29879142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-neurophysiological responses to speech during early childhood: Effects of background noise.
    White-Schwoch T; Davies EC; Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; Nicol T; Bradlow AR; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():34-47. PubMed ID: 26113025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of meaning on the perception of speech sounds.
    Kazanina N; Phillips C; Idsardi W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Jul; 103(30):11381-6. PubMed ID: 16849423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integrating prediction errors at two time scales permits rapid recalibration of speech sound categories.
    Olasagasti I; Giraud AL
    Elife; 2020 Mar; 9():. PubMed ID: 32223894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task-irrelevant visual letters interact with the processing of speech sounds in heteromodal and unimodal cortex.
    Blau V; van Atteveldt N; Formisano E; Goebel R; Blomert L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):500-9. PubMed ID: 18702722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of visual material and temporal synchrony on the processing of letters and speech sounds.
    Mittag M; Takegata R; Kujala T
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(2):287-98. PubMed ID: 21516331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing brighter: changing in-depth visual perception through looming sounds.
    Sutherland CA; Thut G; Romei V
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 24858108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactive coding of visual spatial frequency and auditory amplitude-modulation rate.
    Guzman-Martinez E; Ortega L; Grabowecky M; Mossbridge J; Suzuki S
    Curr Biol; 2012 Mar; 22(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 22326023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds.
    Froyen D; Van Atteveldt N; Bonte M; Blomert L
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18023979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy.
    Bruderer AG; Danielson DK; Kandhadai P; Werker JF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Nov; 112(44):13531-6. PubMed ID: 26460030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.