168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22633005)
1. Synthetic aperture imaging in breast ultrasound: a preliminary clinical study.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Kim C; Park J; Yoo Y; Moon WK; Cho N; Choi BI
Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):923-9. PubMed ID: 22633005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of ultrasound synthetic aperture imaging using bidirectional pixel-based focusing: preliminary phantom and in vivo breast study.
Kim C; Yoon C; Park JH; Lee Y; Kim WH; Chang JM; Choi BI; Song TK; Yoo YM
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2716-24. PubMed ID: 23686939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speckle reduction approach for breast ultrasound image and its application to breast cancer diagnosis.
Su Y; Wang H; Wang Y; Guo Y; Cheng H; Zhang Y; Tian J
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e136-41. PubMed ID: 19913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Precision imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison with conventional sonography in terms of image quality.
Yazgan C; Akata D; Ozmen M; Karcaaltincaba M
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Aug; 32(8):1405-10. PubMed ID: 23887950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of a novel segmentation algorithm on radiologists' diagnosis of breast masses using ultrasound imaging.
Tian JW; Ning CP; Guo YH; Cheng HD; Tang XL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Jan; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 22104530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: A comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging.
Zhao M; Liu Z; Sha Y; Wang S; Ye X; Pan Y; Wang S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 26541548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions.
Zhang X; Xiao Y; Zeng J; Qiu W; Qian M; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jan; 83(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24148563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Paramagul C; Bailey J; Nees AV; Blane C
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):716-24. PubMed ID: 17244717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining low-, high-level and empirical domain knowledge for automated segmentation of ultrasonic breast lesions.
Madabhushi A; Metaxas DN
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12715992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: qualitative and quantitative comparison of SPACE MR imaging with turbo spin-echo MR imaging.
Dohan A; Gavini JP; Placé V; Sebbag D; Vignaud A; Herbin C; Hamzi L; Boudiaf M; Soyer P
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e655-61. PubMed ID: 23957939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging.
Xiao Y; Zeng J; Niu L; Zeng Q; Wu T; Wang C; Zheng R; Zheng H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 24268454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission for magnetic resonance breast imaging at 3T: any added clinical value?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Zhou C; Chen M; Dai Y; Fu Y; Zhao X
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 24582548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Texture feature analysis for breast ultrasound image enhancement.
Liao YY; Wu JC; Li CH; Yeh CK
Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 22518956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance imaging of fibrotic changes of breast disease: correlations between elastography findings and pathologic and short Tau inversion recovery imaging results, including the enhancement ratio and apparent diffusion coefficient.
Matsubayashi RN; Imanishi M; Nakagawa S; Takahashi R; Akashi M; Momosaki S; Muranaka T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25299798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing different ultrasound imaging methods for breast cancer detection.
Ozmen N; Dapp R; Zapf M; Gemmeke H; Ruiter NV; van Dongen KW
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Apr; 62(4):637-46. PubMed ID: 25881342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of conventional, compounding, computer enhancement, and compounding with computer enhancement in ultrasound imaging of the breast.
Barr RG; Maldonado RL; Georgian-Smith D
Ultrasound Q; 2009 Sep; 25(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 19730052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
