146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22633540)
1. Use of the photoelastic method and finite element analysis in the assessment of wall strain in abdominal aortic aneurysm models.
Doyle BJ; Killion J; Callanan A
J Biomech; 2012 Jun; 45(10):1759-68. PubMed ID: 22633540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element and photoelastic modelling of an abdominal aortic aneurysm: a comparative study.
Callanan A; Morris LG; McGloughlin TM
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(10):1111-9. PubMed ID: 21660780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of initial stress for abdominal aortic aneurysm wall motion: dynamic MRI validated finite element analysis.
Merkx MA; van 't Veer M; Speelman L; Breeuwer M; Buth J; van de Vosse FN
J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2369-73. PubMed ID: 19665127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stereoscopically observed deformations of a compliant abdominal aortic aneurysm model.
Meyer CA; Bertrand E; Boiron O; Deplano V
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Nov; 133(11):111004. PubMed ID: 22168736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Speelman L; Bohra A; Bosboom EM; Schurink GW; van de Vosse FN; Makaorun MS; Vorp DA
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quasi-static failure properties of the abdominal aortic aneurysm wall estimated by a mixed experimental-numerical approach.
Forsell C; Swedenborg J; Roy J; Gasser TC
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1554-66. PubMed ID: 23263935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms: predicted rupture risk correlates with aortic wall histology in individual patients.
Erhart P; Grond-Ginsbach C; Hakimi M; Lasitschka F; Dihlmann S; Böckler D; Hyhlik-Dürr A
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Aug; 21(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 25101586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.
Bluestein D; Dumont K; De Beule M; Ricotta J; Impellizzeri P; Verhegghe B; Verdonck P
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb; 12(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18651282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D reconstruction and manufacture of real abdominal aortic aneurysms: from CT scan to silicone model.
Doyle BJ; Morris LG; Callanan A; Kelly P; Vorp DA; McGloughlin TM
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):034501. PubMed ID: 18532870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
Rissland P; Alemu Y; Einav S; Ricotta J; Bluestein D
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution.
Martufi G; Di Martino ES; Amon CH; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Jun; 131(6):061015. PubMed ID: 19449969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Wall stress and flow dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms: finite element analysis vs. fluid-structure interaction.
Scotti CM; Jimenez J; Muluk SC; Finol EA
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Jun; 11(3):301-22. PubMed ID: 18568827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.
Maier A; Gee MW; Reeps C; Pongratz J; Eckstein HH; Wall WA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 38(10):3124-34. PubMed ID: 20480238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of regional mechanical properties of abdominal aortic aneurysms to advance finite element modeling of rupture risk.
Tierney ÁP; Callanan A; McGloughlin TM
J Endovasc Ther; 2012 Feb; 19(1):100-14. PubMed ID: 22313210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porohyperelastic finite element modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Ayyalasomayajula A; Vande Geest JP; Simon BR
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Oct; 132(10):104502. PubMed ID: 20887020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
Rodríguez JF; Ruiz C; Doblaré M; Holzapfel GA
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simple geometric characteristics fail to reliably predict abdominal aortic aneurysm wall stresses.
Hua J; Mower WR
J Vasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 34(2):308-15. PubMed ID: 11496284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Wolters BJ; Rutten MC; Schurink GW; Kose U; de Hart J; van de Vosse FN
Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The long-term relationship of wall stress to the natural history of abdominal aortic aneurysms (finite element analysis and other methods).
Fillinger M
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():22-8. PubMed ID: 17182919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Association Between Geometry and Wall Stress in Emergently Repaired Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Chauhan SS; Gutierrez CA; Thirugnanasambandam M; De Oliveira V; Muluk SC; Eskandari MK; Finol EA
Ann Biomed Eng; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1908-1916. PubMed ID: 28444478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
